I was told by one manufacturer of ozonated water devices that this water actually has a very high ORP. As it floods the body with oxygen, this is very counterintuitive, much like lemon water being an alkalizer. I don't have the background in chemistry to understand how this can be true, but I believe the information is factual and verifiable (or at least falsifiable) quite easily with an ORP meter. If this is correct, ozonated water might have a deadly effect on anaerobic pathogens while not causing oxidative stress. I'm keen to try the product someday.
On 2010/11/24, at 4:06, David AuBuchon wrote: > I know someone who just got IV MMS (not activated). He felt really run down > for a few days aftwerword. I wonder if MMS is really safe. Humble says it > does not affect healthy tissues, and says it is a weak oxidizer. I wonder if > someone knows about calculating "oxidation potential" or whatever it is > called, and comparing it to other substances? Ozone therapy appears to be > harmless for example, but it probably has very few actual number of free > radicals compared to taking MMS. > > ~Davud > > On Tue, Nov 23, 2010 at 10:59 AM, bob Larson <[email protected]> wrote: > here's the highlights of my personal experience as well as observations of > others (on MMS & CS lists over time) with both. > > if CS works for you, forget MMS. > MMS is harsh on the body... it is a powerful oxidizer and while it kills > pathogens it also depletes antioxidants, so heavy antioxidant > supplementation is needed after not long. > MMS reacts with whatever it contacts that is susceptible to oxidation, > including body tissues. > MMS is used up rapidly reacting with stuff, and mostly doesn't make it into > hard to reach places where pathogens may be, like inside host cells (virus) > and is mostly only good at getting to stuff in the blood. > MMS over time is hard on the immune system because of depletion of > antioxidants. > CS, by unknown means seems to enhance the immune system and silver does get > into all the cells of the body with long term use. when it gets inside > cells it doesn't leave readily, so while it may take the form of silver > compounds, those compounds may still be direct pathogen killers. > CS appears to have the ability to cause apoptosis of cancer cells. MMS may > destroy cancer cells by oxidation, showing initial benefit but as the MMS > runs down the immune system the cancer may get the upper hand. > MMS may be better for many problems where a short term burst of high kill > power is needed against stuff in the blood, and might be good to use in > "pulses" with CS used when the MMS is not. > MMS is vile to the taste... CS is not. > > more, but i have no time to go on and am not an expert. > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Beth [mailto:[email protected]] > > Sent: Tuesday, November 23, 2010 6:32 AM > > To: silver-list > > Subject: CS>cs vs mms? > > > > Hi > > Okay so I have been studying results from CS and MMS. > > Can someone tell me what the difference is? > > Is there a different result if I use silver compared to using mms? > > Or do they both do the same thing? > > If you have an opinion whether scientific or not, I would > > like to hear it. > > > > Beth > > > > > > > -- > The Silver List is a moderated forum for discussing Colloidal Silver. > Rules and Instructions: http://www.silverlist.org > > Unsubscribe: > <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe> > Archives: > http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/maillist.html > > Off-Topic discussions: <mailto:[email protected]> > List Owner: Mike Devour <mailto:[email protected]> > > >
