OK, though trust me he has absolutely zero interest in anything I grow :-).
They'll be on my bedroom windowsill so he wouldn't see them be watered
anyway.

Cheers
Kirsteen

On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 9:03 PM, Marshall <[email protected]> wrote:

> **
> You need to let him label the water he gives you 1,2,3,4 with the plants
> labeled A,B,C,D, and you need to be the only one that knows which water
> goes to which plant, and only he should know which water goes with with
> which bottle.  He should not even see you water them, as he could see which
> water went to which plant, and his intentions could then affect the outcome.
>
> Marshall
>
>
> On 5/11/2012 2:51 PM, Kirsteen Wright wrote:
>
> You know I'd really like to try this. Would this methodology work? I take
> 5 2litre plastic bottles (sorry only have plastic) fill one with tap water,
> one with filtered tap water, one with Scottish spring water, one with tap
> water boiled on stove and cooled, one with tap water microwaved to boil and
> cooled. I'll label each bottle A, B, C etc, get my son to fill each, write
> down what he filled it with but don't let me see the list. I'll then take a
> packet of sunflower seeds 'cos they sprout pretty quick, and plant 3 seeds
> in each of 5 identical pots filled with compost from the same bag. I'll
> label the pots A, B, C etc, sit them on the same windowsill and give them
> all a measured amount of water each day from their appropriate bottle. I
> won't know which is which but should be able to see if they grow roughly
> evenly or not.
>
> Have I missed anything?
>
> Kirsteen
>
>
>
>
> On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 7:00 PM, Marshall <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> The pictures of those tests are a rip-off.   These pictures were taken by
>> my daughter in Knoxville, TN about a science fair project project my
>> granddaughter did about 10 years ago.
>>
>> It can be explained simply because the plants responded to the
>> experimenters desires and intentions.  For it to be valid would require it
>> to be completely double blind.  Fact is, you can have two plants, and send
>> one loving thoughts, and the other thoughts of death, and over a short
>> period get similar results.
>>
>> Marshall
>>
>>
>> On 5/11/2012 4:07 AM, Mark wrote:
>>
>>> So if microwave is so harmless then could someone explain why plants die
>>> if they are watered with microwaved water?
>>>
>>> Here's some evidence...
>>> Http://Hinduism.co.za/trees.htm
>>>
>>> I did the test myself, but never captured photos and I got the same
>>> results.
>>>
>>> -Regards,
>>>
>>> Mark
>>>
>>>
>>> On 11 May 2012, at 2:23, "Mike Monett"<[email protected]>  wrote:
>>>
>>> David AuBuchon<[email protected]>  wrote:
>>>
>>>  Did Mike even do some basic google searching to confirm there is no
>>>> evidence microwaves have negative health effects?  No, it appears not.
>>>>
>>> Yes, Mike did all the googling to search for evidence of harm.
>>>
>>> Like most things, a weak analysis capability can convince you of
>>> anything.
>>>
>>> I am finished with this topic.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> Mike Monett
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> The Silver List is a moderated forum for discussing Colloidal Silver.
>>>  Rules and Instructions: http://www.silverlist.org
>>>
>>> Unsubscribe:
>>>  <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe>
>>> Archives:
>>>  http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/maillist.html
>>>
>>> Off-Topic discussions:<mailto:[email protected]>
>>> List Owner: Mike Devour<mailto:[email protected]>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>