Vitamix is a 2 horsepower at max which is 1492 watts ... for reference. I have a vitamix and leave it on the counter and find it easy to use.
Jaxi On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 7:07 PM, Lena Guyot <[email protected]> wrote: > I don't have a Vitamix, but two of my friends do and they don't seem to > mind what difference there may be, preferring the convenience and handier > size of the Nutribullet. One gave her visiting son a NutriBullet and he > sort of sneered at it, saying he already had a Vitamix. After a few day's > visit, he was as sold on the thing as she was! > I think the MagicBullet was 250 watts, and the Nutribullet is 600 watts. I > don't know the wattage of the Vitamix. I do know it's powered friction can > heat the food: the Nutribullet can't do that. > Be well, > Léna > > On Jan 4, 2013, at 7:46 PM, Elizabeth Williams wrote: > > I have the original bullet and use it daily. How would you compare the > nutribullet to a vitamix for power? > > Elizabeth Williams > [email protected] > > > ------------------------------ > From: [email protected] > Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2013 19:29:18 -0500 > To: [email protected] > Subject: CS>Re: CS>blending versus juicing: my 2¢ > > I've retired my Champion juicer! Even with feeding the pulp through > several times, I know there was loss of nutrients by that method. Unable to > afford a Vitamix, I'm making smoothies and juices with my Nutribullet (not > to be confused with less powerful MagicBullet) and have increased my > organic raw-veggie/fruit intake to a much higher level. > > The convenience of this helped compliance. Compliance is a factor to be > considered. The Champion was such a pain to clean that it languished on my > counter, unused, a lot. The Nutribullet gets used several times a day. Even > some of my Vitamix friends prefer the Nutribullet for easy use. > > No, I don't have any commercial, vested interest in this product and I > don't know how durable it will be, long-term, but it's performed well for > almost 8 months. > > Be well, > Léna > On Jan 4, 2013, at 6:29 PM, Paul wrote: > > I do one of each every day :). > > Sent from my iPhone > > On Jan 4, 2013, at 5:39 PM, Alan Jones <[email protected]> wrote: > > Apologies if this is too off topic or covered before. > > > Is there any consensus in the blender versus juicing debate, wrt which one > (a) damages nutrients less and (b) which results in the most absorb-able > output? > > > I read lots of claims both ways but I wonder if there is any real evidence > supporting any of the claims? > > > It seems logical to me that both do about the same amount of "damage" to > the food, even the expensive juicers like a Norwalk, no? > > > -- > > Alan Jones > > > "The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor > prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or > to the people." (Tenth Amendment to the US Constitution) > > > > -- > The Silver List is a moderated forum for discussing Colloidal Silver. > Rules and Instructions: http://www.silverlist.org > > Unsubscribe: > <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe> > Archives: > http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/maillist.html > > Off-Topic discussions: > <mailto:[email protected]<[email protected]> > > > List Owner: Mike Devour <mailto:[email protected] <[email protected]>> > > > > > >
