I don't have a Vitamix, but two of my friends do and they don't seem to mind what difference there may be, preferring the convenience and handier size of the Nutribullet. One gave her visiting son a NutriBullet and he sort of sneered at it, saying he already had a Vitamix. After a few day's visit, he was as sold on the thing as she was! I think the MagicBullet was 250 watts, and the Nutribullet is 600 watts. I don't know the wattage of the Vitamix. I do know it's powered friction can heat the food: the Nutribullet can't do that. Be well, Léna On Jan 4, 2013, at 7:46 PM, Elizabeth Williams wrote:
> I have the original bullet and use it daily. How would you compare the > nutribullet to a vitamix for power? > > Elizabeth Williams > [email protected] > > > From: [email protected] > Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2013 19:29:18 -0500 > To: [email protected] > Subject: CS>Re: CS>blending versus juicing: my 2¢ > > I've retired my Champion juicer! Even with feeding the pulp through several > times, I know there was loss of nutrients by that method. Unable to afford a > Vitamix, I'm making smoothies and juices with my Nutribullet (not to be > confused with less powerful MagicBullet) and have increased my organic > raw-veggie/fruit intake to a much higher level. > > The convenience of this helped compliance. Compliance is a factor to be > considered. The Champion was such a pain to clean that it languished on my > counter, unused, a lot. The Nutribullet gets used several times a day. Even > some of my Vitamix friends prefer the Nutribullet for easy use. > > No, I don't have any commercial, vested interest in this product and I don't > know how durable it will be, long-term, but it's performed well for almost 8 > months. > > Be well, > Léna > On Jan 4, 2013, at 6:29 PM, Paul wrote: > > I do one of each every day :). > > Sent from my iPhone > > On Jan 4, 2013, at 5:39 PM, Alan Jones <[email protected]> wrote: > > Apologies if this is too off topic or covered before. > > Is there any consensus in the blender versus juicing debate, wrt which one > (a) damages nutrients less and (b) which results in the most absorb-able > output? > > I read lots of claims both ways but I wonder if there is any real evidence > supporting any of the claims? > > It seems logical to me that both do about the same amount of "damage" to the > food, even the expensive juicers like a Norwalk, no? > > -- > Alan Jones > > "The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor > prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or > to the people." (Tenth Amendment to the US Constitution) > > > -- > The Silver List is a moderated forum for discussing Colloidal Silver. > Rules and Instructions: http://www.silverlist.org > > Unsubscribe: > <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe> > Archives: > http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/maillist.html > > Off-Topic discussions: <mailto:[email protected]> > List Owner: Mike Devour <mailto:[email protected]> > > > >
