Mini Beet Protocol ~ Robert Von <http://robertvon.com/mbp.html>
Robert Von, a nutritionist seems to think juicing produces better results then blending. I have used his mini beet protocol, MBP, for about a year, and it does work well for health promoting, in myself it produced skin oil, that almost makes it impossible to break through when showering or shampooing, I hardly need a towel to dry, it does help with aging as well, and seems to give more energy, very anti candida as well, and not as fast acting as lufenuron or kerosene, albeit, I have not used another type of juicing. I know the russians and slovs used beet juice, both fermented and raw to cure cancer in many cases. It seems both work well. I do enjoy the flavor of fennel, refreshing and unusual taste. where I be in wes tex, fennel is more expensive then celery, so I alternate them in the mini beet formula. I have recommended the MBP to several folks and all seem to get good results. carrots come with sugar, but also with acidophiles for digestion, and beets are harvested in my area to make sugar as well as cattle feed. But glucose problems do not seem to be a problem using this juicing. I make enough juice at one sitting for morning and evening use, about twenty ounces, save half to take mornings, as I am usually pressed for time at that moment. I add some lemon juice to the recipe as citrus juice stops or slows break down of the juice. We can get a good education on juicers on utube, just go there and search for juicing, John will tell you all about them, as well as juicing. I have used the masticator, the single action, and the press, the press produces a nice tasting clean juice, and if you have lived greedily, it might be for you, otherwise I notice no diff with each one as to my health, so in my opinion there is more sales hype, then final results out there, Juicing in itself is not hype, it is well worth the time, energy and monies spent, GMO's should be totally avoided if that is possible, but growing up on a large farm and owning my own, modifying plants has been going on by monsanto for sixty or more years, so there may well be no way to knowingly avoid them, in america we are a profit motivated society at the costs of everything else, certainly to include health, as always buyer beware, david lubbock tx. On Sat, Jan 5, 2013 at 1:11 AM, Neville Munn <one.red...@hotmail.com> wrote: > Assuming one can choose between GMO'd stuff and the real deal I'd say > GMO'd *anything* should be left on the shelf <g>. I seriously doubt anyone > knows with any certainty what one is eating or drinking today, GMO'd or > otherwise? > > N. > > ------------------------------ > From: mutt...@isp.com > To: kag...@cox.net; silver-list@eskimo.com > > Subject: Re: CS>blending versus juicing > Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2013 17:35:20 -0800 > > > I would hope, for your sake, that you would leave all the GMO's at the > store. > > ----- Original Message ----- > *From:* kagi <kag...@cox.net> > *To:* silver-list@eskimo.com > *Sent:* Friday, January 04, 2013 4:13 PM > *Subject:* Re: CS>blending versus juicing > > Should GMO food be blended, or juiced? Which is better? [image: Smile] > > *From:* Alan Jones <alanmjo...@gmail.com> > *Sent:* Friday, 04 January, 2013 16:39 > *To:* silver-list@eskimo.com > *Subject:* CS>blending versus juicing > > Apologies if this is too off topic or covered before. > > Is there any consensus in the blender versus juicing debate, wrt which one > (a) damages nutrients less and (b) which results in the most absorb-able > output? > > I read lots of claims both ways but I wonder if there is any real evidence > supporting any of the claims? > > It seems logical to me that both do about the same amount of "damage" to > the food, even the expensive juicers like a Norwalk, no? > > -- > Alan Jones > > "The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor > prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or > to the people." (Tenth Amendment to the US Constitution) > >
<<wlEmoticon-smile[1].png>>
