Well for one, if any of those 'old CS researchers' so called have left it's
probly because what we make by the LVDC method in our kitchens is not 'CS' so
they would have had nothing to learn or contribute.
And two, if that article was worth reading I would not have to jump through
hoops or run an obstacle course to read it, it would be freely available, I can
readily read some other articles in that rag but not that one, why? Don't know
and don't care, so the road to give a hoot is............That way! <g>. I
doubt I would learn anything worthwhile in it anyway of which I couldn't learn
or haven't already learnt somewhere else with no hoops to jump through.
Remember, I'm the black sheep here, I don't follow flocks, only dead fish go
with the flow - LOL.
And if one's going to be lazy, they got to be good at it <g>.
And I've yet to find a 'researcher?' today that researches what we make? Don't
know about the FDA but our TGA certainly hasn't 'researched' it, our TGA's
response to my questions came from the Internet, how worthwhile or intelligent
or 'researched' is that? Quoting the same old regurgitated rubbish and
misleading BS referencing a product of which is NOT what we produce?
Did I mention something about 'confusing' people?
N.
From: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: CS>Fw: Chicago Tribune
Date: Sat, 22 Feb 2014 20:22:23 -0600
So, we have two members that leave lengthily
comments about the article -THAT NEVER READ IT.
Too lazy to enter a zip code and a password for a
FREE membership to read it.
No wonder all the old CS researchers have left this
site...
