Thinking requires an open mind, right? Sent from my iPad
> On Feb 24, 2015, at 2:36 AM, Dee <d...@deetroy.org> wrote: > > I think the best line to take - being that there is no absolute proof > available - is to keep an open mind.....Dee > > Sent from my iPad > >> On 24 Feb 2015, at 04:18, Victor Cozzetto <victor.cozze...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Hi Neville, Dave, >> >> I would have to take issue with your statement that 'thought does not have >> anything to do with anything.' We are far past the 'voodoo' and 'magic' >> stigma at this point. Fields of science such as PNI (Psychoneuroimmunology) >> are well established on a firm bed of experimental results. Not to mention >> all the things happening in epigenetics. There is no question that our state >> of mind has a direct impact on our health. >> >> We are more than mere machines. Food for thought: One of the most shocking >> displays of the power of the mind is found in those that suffer from split >> personality disorder. There are cases when one personality emerges, and >> instantly changes the eye color of the individual, causes scars to emerge on >> the body, and other radical physiological changes. And it all changes back >> when that persona changes. >> >> A more romantic example is the link between two people in two different >> faraday cages. I'll save that for another time, if anyone is interested. Of >> course you can google such things. >> >> I don't think you guys meant to sound so absolute, but I did not want to >> leave those comments hanging out there. And I thought this might be >> interesting to some people. >> >> Victor >> >> >> >>> On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 8:29 AM, Neville <one.red...@hotmail.com> wrote: >>> Humans are the only animals that have the power to think and reason, >>> animals/reptiles/insects etc etc just do what they do by instinct without >>> thinking or reasoning anything. Animals are prone to cancer so it doesn't >>> follow that thought has anything to do with anything, however, if it makes >>> people feel better or more positive about things then that's fine, let's >>> face it, people need 'something' to believe in, animals etc don't need to >>> believe in anything, they just are. >>> >>> Barry Lynes book "The Cancer Cure that Worked" explains the cancer virus >>> and how it has the ability to morph into different shapes/forms. For >>> decades the "experts?" considered only one form of cancer, {monomorhic}, >>> back in the 30's Rife and I believe Kendall proved this is not so, cancer >>> virus is pleomorphic {changes shape/form}, and this is probably why so >>> many cancers are missed early, because they don't know what to look for, >>> and because you can't tell todays "experts?" anything they are probably >>> still stuck in their Prehistoric thinking and in complete denial. >>> >>> It's a war out there today between those who truly understand research >>> {they are pretty much an extinct species today} and those funded by a >>> particular funding body who pay researchers to provide acceptable answers. >>> >>> Independant thinkers, those who have not and will not be conditioned and >>> institutionalised by the system are a dying breed and are becoming more and >>> more ostracised and ridiculed by the general public. If one doesn't 'toe >>> the establishment line' then one will be forced to toe the line by >>> legislation/coercion/emotional blackmail/guilt etc. >>> >>> N. >>> >>> Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2015 10:14:05 -0800 >>> Subject: Re: CS>Cancer being a virus >>> From: ddarrin...@gmail.com >>> To: silver-list@eskimo.com >>> >>> There is a theory that Cancer is accomplished by cells that normally die >>> when new replacements are formed, fail to do so, thereby a doubling of >>> cells at a given location. >>> Called Apoptosis I believe or something like that. >>> Would explain why it occurs in animals and has nothing to do with thought. >>> Dave >>