I think the best line to take - being that there is no absolute proof available - is to keep an open mind.....Dee
Sent from my iPad > On 24 Feb 2015, at 04:18, Victor Cozzetto <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi Neville, Dave, > > I would have to take issue with your statement that 'thought does not have > anything to do with anything.' We are far past the 'voodoo' and 'magic' > stigma at this point. Fields of science such as PNI (Psychoneuroimmunology) > are well established on a firm bed of experimental results. Not to mention > all the things happening in epigenetics. There is no question that our state > of mind has a direct impact on our health. > > We are more than mere machines. Food for thought: One of the most shocking > displays of the power of the mind is found in those that suffer from split > personality disorder. There are cases when one personality emerges, and > instantly changes the eye color of the individual, causes scars to emerge on > the body, and other radical physiological changes. And it all changes back > when that persona changes. > > A more romantic example is the link between two people in two different > faraday cages. I'll save that for another time, if anyone is interested. Of > course you can google such things. > > I don't think you guys meant to sound so absolute, but I did not want to > leave those comments hanging out there. And I thought this might be > interesting to some people. > > Victor > > > >> On Tue, Feb 24, 2015 at 8:29 AM, Neville <[email protected]> wrote: >> Humans are the only animals that have the power to think and reason, >> animals/reptiles/insects etc etc just do what they do by instinct without >> thinking or reasoning anything. Animals are prone to cancer so it doesn't >> follow that thought has anything to do with anything, however, if it makes >> people feel better or more positive about things then that's fine, let's >> face it, people need 'something' to believe in, animals etc don't need to >> believe in anything, they just are. >> >> Barry Lynes book "The Cancer Cure that Worked" explains the cancer virus and >> how it has the ability to morph into different shapes/forms. For decades >> the "experts?" considered only one form of cancer, {monomorhic}, back in the >> 30's Rife and I believe Kendall proved this is not so, cancer virus is >> pleomorphic {changes shape/form}, and this is probably why so many cancers >> are missed early, because they don't know what to look for, and because you >> can't tell todays "experts?" anything they are probably still stuck in their >> Prehistoric thinking and in complete denial. >> >> It's a war out there today between those who truly understand research {they >> are pretty much an extinct species today} and those funded by a particular >> funding body who pay researchers to provide acceptable answers. >> >> Independant thinkers, those who have not and will not be conditioned and >> institutionalised by the system are a dying breed and are becoming more and >> more ostracised and ridiculed by the general public. If one doesn't 'toe >> the establishment line' then one will be forced to toe the line by >> legislation/coercion/emotional blackmail/guilt etc. >> >> N. >> >> Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2015 10:14:05 -0800 >> Subject: Re: CS>Cancer being a virus >> From: [email protected] >> To: [email protected] >> >> There is a theory that Cancer is accomplished by cells that normally die >> when new replacements are formed, fail to do so, thereby a doubling of cells >> at a given location. >> Called Apoptosis I believe or something like that. >> Would explain why it occurs in animals and has nothing to do with thought. >> Dave >
