Hi Lola:
Anyone can do what the search engine watch companies are doing (have
aready done), and study how a website renders under different platforms.
The website wasn't touched, they only lost their search engine rankings,
so anyone is free to investigate.
Some people pay a few hundred dollars a month just for automated tools
that tear apart how a website renders, and how a website is viewed
through "search engine eyes".
It's a big no no in the Big G handbook to redirect content based on
device, which is what it looks like they were doing.
It could be innocent, it could be a webmaster mistake, or it could be
trying to cheat the system.
Either way, this method of serving content CANNOT be allowed at all,
because it gives black hat SEO's an instant way to cheat the search
engine rankings.
That's why the methodology is not judged on a "case by case" or "merit"
method, and why there is no "pre-warning" system. The black hat SEO's
would just keep pushing the system until they figure out how to bypass
G's detection algos, then bank hundreds of thousands of dollars before
the search engine can make a correction.
It HAS to be a zero tolerance policy.
On 2/24/2017 4:53 PM, [email protected] wrote:
But now that Google has removed the entity in question, there is nothing to
research or discern? Whose agenda does that serve? By the way, I agree with
Ron.
Lola
----- Original Message -----
From: Jason <[email protected]>
To: [email protected]
Sent: Fri, 24 Feb 2017 19:37:27 -0500 (EST)
Subject: Re: CS>Natural News under attack--who's next?
...and furthermore, if we don't each take the time to research and
understand what is going on, then we are only being manipulated to serve
someone else's agenda.
On 2/24/2017 4:19 PM, Ron wrote:
Yesterday free speech. Today censorship - tomorrow ????????????
On 2/24/2017 3:46 PM, Jason wrote:
Hi Bob:
I agree with you 100%. Natural News has become nothing more than a
grocery store tabloid with a political motivation.
...just because Mike says something, doesn't mean that it is true. In
fact, it's laughably ridiculous:
http://searchengineland.com/natural-news-not-banned-google-fake-news-269998
...Google gave Natural News its prominence (and they make a lot of
money with advertising), and for the time being, has taken it away.
On 2/24/2017 1:34 PM, bob Larson wrote:
the mix of real info & crapola in the Natural News is bad enough that
their demise is no loss at all in my opinion. do they still exist as
before in other sesrch engines?
Sent from my iPhone
On Feb 24, 2017, at 12:46 PM, Sandee George <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
Nenah thanks for this information, which is more of the same deterrent
to save face and create unrest for others. It is everywhere, as we
are all en-captured in the fear of survival which is rife at this time
on our very damaged planet - we simply have to turn our minds inside
of ourselves and trust on what we are told by our inner voices as our
direction forward and the truth for us, we cannot allow the
perspectives of others to be our guide!!!!! This is my answer to
those who trust in outside of themselves for the truth - remember we
are all connected we are all one, so we all are connected to the GOD
conscience with sees, and knows everything, not us individually Let me
ask you one question WHAT IS TRUTH ? This idea, I may add, is not
religion but spirituality !!!!!
Peace, love and hugs
Sandee??
An attitude of gratitude is everything!!!
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
Alive Again Colloidal Silver Products
Topical Gel & Eye Drops
--
The Silver List is a moderated forum for discussing Colloidal Silver.
Rules and Instructions: http://www.silverlist.org
Unsubscribe:
<mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe>
Archives:
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/maillist.html
Off-Topic discussions: <mailto:[email protected]>
List Owner: Mike Devour <mailto:[email protected]>
