Hi Ode, That was fascinating. Thank you!
Jean On Thu, Jun 18, 2020 at 6:03 AM Ode Coyote <[email protected]> wrote: > They promote the Fluoride side of things because it's "establishment > approved", but the REAL deal is the TriCalcium Phosphate. {ode} > > > 3M™ Vanish™ 5% Sodium Fluoride White Varnish with Tri-Calcium Phosphate > > - The #1-selling fluoride varnish in the U.S. > - Extended Release Formula – continuously releasing fluoride up to 24 > hours > - Contains 22,600 ppm fluoride and tri-calcium phosphate (TCP) > - Advanced protection – virtually invisible and durable, long-lasting > coating > > > Specifications > Flavor > Assorted, Cherry, Cherry/Melon, Melon, Mint > Material > Sodium Fluoride > Product Type > Varnish > Size > 100, 1000, 50 > Details > > - The #1-selling fluoride varnish in the U.S. > - Extended Release Formula – continuously releasing fluoride up to 24 > hours > - Contains 22,600 ppm fluoride and tri-calcium phosphate (TCP) > - Advanced protection – virtually invisible and durable, long-lasting > coating > - Easy to apply, no drying needed > - Fast, horizontal sweep application > - Can be applied to tooth surfaces where plaque is present > - Unique applicator, for back-of-glove dispensing > - High fluoride uptake, even after acid attack > - Relieves hypersensitivity > - Over 10 years of clinical success. > > An optimized, clear varnish with an extended release of fluoride [yech], > calcium and phosphate [Da good stuff] – up to 24 hours. It is formulated to > stay in contact with the teeth longer, for effective and advanced > protection, depositing strong acid-resistant mineral on tooth surfaces, > including dentin tubules, to relieve hypersensitivity. [the calcium and > phosphate is what does that...not so much the fluoride ] > > On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 11:41 AM Reid Harvey <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Greetings All, I'm seeking opinions as to whether swishing around the >> mouth, our ~10ppm Ag+ (particularly around the gums) would allay the need >> for a *deep cleaning* by the dentist. They cite the proliferation of >> bacteria there as a problem, of course, but wouldn't CS/EIS solve the >> problem? >> >
