PT Ferrance Thank you and your colleague for adding this as I don't think that Dr. Mikovitz is a quack or anything that they've made her out to be. She was unlawfully and immorally taken from her home and imprisoned without due process of law. That alone tell you a lot about our system and how it looks the other way when the right person or money is presented. The Mexican Police are often given as this example.
Many if not all those who tell the truths which are both, moral, and real opposition to what Big Pharma wants and usually gets are silenced, threatened, and lives destroyed. Despite the harm they impose on We The People who are not protected because they've changed the rule of law *away* *from* government by the people. And the primary reason is not that these people are telling us the truths per se'. It is because if enough people know the truth. Then Big Pharma CAN'T sell enough product to make huge profits. I was looking up a couple of long-established natural remedies which cost me less than a dinner out. And although medical websites mostly admit that they work and some citing long-established cases around the world, they Also Include the text that these are unproven remedies and may be hazardous to your health! Now that is saying one thing, and then turning it around and saying the opposite. So it is obvious that Big Pharma has its money influencing what is published... with the near retraction of a long-established remedy for the statement towards the end of the article to cause fear in someone reading it. Just like that Lancet article that had to be removed when the world's doctors questioned how they could have written such a falsehood when everyone knew it to be false based on long-established use to the contrary of the new article and its incorrect statements. But again, PT Ferrance, thank you for bringing this to our attention. On Sun, May 23, 2021 at 1:33 PM PT Ferrance <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Kirsten, I shared the gist of your post with a colleague in Europe. > This is what they shared with me and gave me permission to post. > > "Yes I know about this episode and also some more details about all > persecution and accusations Mikovitz suffered. If you follow the money you > will find important people, patents and big money behind this story. The > Lab in question didn't belong to her... She was never responsible for > contamination security of the facility... I am not worried only with the > greediness and corruption that took over " science" and the Academy, > sometimes protected by politicians who are manipulated by millionaires who > own, also, the big pharma stock. I am worried with the way people is being > cheated in many senses. Mikovitz is an highly experienced and veteran > scientist. By what I know, she speaks and writes coherently, contrary to > many others who have time and voice in the media. After she felt in > disgrace, she was banned from the establishment and she became a kind of > whistleblower... There are many others saying and thinking the same way, > including a Nobel prize who discovered and isolated the HIV virus, the > french scientist Luc Montagnier. I particularly have nothing against her." > > This colleague does not have English as a first language so please be kind > for grammer. I have never found them to be anything but accurate. So I > would tend to accept the above based on our history. > PT > > > > On Sunday, May 23, 2021, 11:46:05 AM EDT, Kirsteen Wright < > [email protected]> wrote: > > > Cindiann, yes, I have ME and years ago, she was doing a big world wide > study on it which sounded great. I actually gave a blood sample for it. She > claimed she'd identified the common denominator which was a retrovirus. > Obviously the ME community was very excited but it turned out no one could > replicate these results at all, find that retrovirus in any ME sufferer, > then her lab was examined and found to be totally contaminated with the > virus from mice she kept there. She was totally discredited and has claimed > wilder and wilder things ever since without having any back up for any of > them. > > On Sun, 23 May 2021, 16:21 Cyndiann Phillips, <[email protected]> wrote: > > Judy is a quack. Why do you keep believing her and posting her links here > when we know that? > > On Sat, May 22, 2021 at 10:26 PM Gmail <[email protected]> wrote: > > > https://drjudyamikovits.com/ > > > This is the way the world ends: not with a bang, but with a whimper. > T.S. Eliot > > > > > > > >
