In a message dated 6/30/00 8:10:39 AM EST, [email protected] writes: << Subj: Re: CS machines Date: 6/30/00 8:10:39 AM EST From: [email protected] (M. G. Devour) Reply-to: [email protected] To: [email protected] I wrote: > >The best reason for not using salt in making CS is that the particles > >produced that way are known to be smaller and are presumed to be > >safer and more bioavailable. > > > >Note that I fully *agree* that it's best to use distilled water. I > >just don't want to overstate the argyria issue. Fred replied: > Yes, Mike, a little won't hurt but you missed the bigger point that > silver chloride is a very weak source of silver ... "weak medicine > (salt water in this case) can be deceiving and thus indirectly > harmful to those that are relying on the Cs to treat a serious > problem!" I was hoping to balance the argyria notion that Marshall raised. That was the point of my message. I would agree with your "weak medicine" concern -- except that we know many folks who did use salt-accelerated CS quite effectively long before the popularization of no-salt recipes. I have to believe, with as much silver as sputtered off the electrodes in that highly conductive water, ...
"sputtered", Mike? How does the LVDC CS process induce sputtering with or without the presence of salt? Roger -- The silver-list is a moderated forum for discussion of colloidal silver. To join or quit silver-list or silver-digest send an e-mail message to: [email protected] -or- [email protected] with the word subscribe or unsubscribe in the SUBJECT line. To post, address your message to: [email protected] Silver-list archive: http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/index.html List maintainer: Mike Devour <[email protected]>
