Hi Roger,

The USPS says this is a hoax/urban legend. At least they did a few months ago. They had reference to it on their web-site. Said it was completely false

Trem



At 04:46 PM 8/25/00 -0400, you wrote:
I apologize to the respective forums that frown upon forwarding messages, but
I thought this particular message was too important not to bring to your
attention. Roger

 > VOTE NO ON Bill 602P!!!!
 > > > >
 > > > >I guess the warnings were true. Federal Bill 602P
 > > > >5-cents per E-mail Sent. It figures! No more free
 > > > >E-mail! We knew this was coming!! Bill 602P will
 > > > >permit the Federal Government to charge a 5-cent
 > > > >charge on every delivered E-mail.
 > > > >
 > > > >Please read the following carefully if you intend to
 > > > >stay online and continue using E-mail. The last
 > > > >few months have revealed an alarming trend in the
 > > > >Government of the United States attempting to quietly
 > > > >push through legislation that will affect our use of
 > > > >the Internet.
 > > > >Under proposed legislation, the US
 > > > >Postal Service will be attempting to bill E-mail users
 > > > >out of "alternative postage fees". Bill 602P will
 > > > >permit the Federal Government to charge a 5-cent
 > > > >surcharge on every E-Mail delivered, by billing
 > > > >Internet Service Providers at source. The consumer
 > > > >would then be billed in turn by the ISP.
 > > > >
 > > > >Washington DC lawyer Richard Stepp is working without
 > > > >pay to prevent this legislation from becoming law. The
 > > > >US Postal Service is claiming lost revenue, due to the
 > > > >proliferation of E-mail, is costing nearly
 > > > >$230,000,000 in revenue per year. You may
 > > > >have noticed their recent ad campaign:
 > > > >"There is nothing like a letter."
 > > > >
 > > > >Since the average person received about 10 pieces of
 > > > >E-mail per day in 1998, the cost of the typical
 > > > >individual would be an additional 50 cents a day - or
 > > > >over $180 per year -above and beyond their regular
 > > > >Internet costs. Note that this would be
 > > > >money paid directly to the US Postal Service for a
 > > > >service they do not even provide.
 > > > >
 > > > >The whole point of the Internet is democracy and
 > > > >non-interference.
 > > > >You are already paying an exorbitant price for snail
 > > > >mail because of bureaucratic efficiency. It currently
 > > > >takes up to 6 days for a
 > > > >letter to be delivered from coast to coast. If
 > > > >the US Postal Service is allowed to
 > > > >tinker with E-mail, it will mark the
 > > > >end of the "free" Internet in the United States.
 > > > >
 > > > >Our congressional representative, Tony Schnell (R) has
 > > > >even suggested a "$20-$40 per month surcharge on all
 > > > >Internet service" above and beyond the government's
 > > > >proposed E-mail charges
 > > > >
 > > > >Note that most of the major newspapers have ignored
 > > > >the
 > > > >story - the only exception being the Washingtonian -
 > > > >which called the idea of E-mail surcharge "a useful
 > > > >concept who's time has come"
 > > > >(March 6th, 1999 Editorial).
 > > > >
 > > > >Do not sit by and watch your freedom erode away! Send
 > > > >this to E-mail to EVERYONE on your list, and tell all
 > > > >your friends and relatives write their congressional
 > > > >representative and say "NO" to Bill 602P. It
 > > > >will only take a few moments of your time and could
 > > > >very well be instrumental in killing a bill we do not
 > > > >want.
 > > > >
 > > > >Please forward!
 >





--
The silver-list is a moderated forum for discussion of colloidal silver.

To join or quit silver-list or silver-digest send an e-mail message to: [email protected] -or- [email protected]
with the word subscribe or unsubscribe in the SUBJECT line.

To post, address your message to: [email protected]
Silver-list archive: http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/index.html
List maintainer: Mike Devour <[email protected]>