It stands to reason that oil would descend fairly fast too and you might possibly get hit by it when its emmitted within visual range. But, if that's the case, it won't be one of those trails that lingers for hours at altitude, will it? Nor will it be something that dissipates immediately after emmission. [because, you 'can' see it]
So, there's one photo...'maybe' a second [the "flaps"]...that fits the bill, but the rest don't show anything like what you describe. My first suspicion would be somewhat low level [tax dollar] fuel dumping by the military. They do that sometimes for safety reasons. [and because they can get away with it..so far] JP4 or 5 would certainly burn and sting the eyes and skin and leave a residue on water. ..and it won't take much of it either. No question! Fire fighting planes use a chemical additive in the water. Don't know the properties, but while fighting a forest fire in Wyoming we were told to get out of the area while they dumped the load. Were there any fires in your area at the time? Irresponsible and reprehensible, but still no conspiracy unless scope, frequency and/or purpose can be established. Irresponsibility doesn't count towards a conspiracy. Take some photos! Might have a $$$lawsuit there. Back when I was kid, our house was damaged by sonic booms. The mil doesn't do that anymore...much. Ken At 10:14 AM 6/8/01 -0400, you wrote: >Of course. Oil doesn't evaporate. All you have to do is wait long enough and watch >it. Takes about an hour or two depending on how high they were put down. Seen it >at least 3 times, but since the first time when it burned our skin, eyes and >noses, I won't go out in it when it decends. > >Marshall > >Ode Coyote wrote: > >> You have actually seen con/chemtrails make it to the ground? >> Ken >> >> At 11:01 AM 6/7/01 -0400, you wrote: >> >Ode Coyote wrote: >> > >> >> This and All the other photos show a sky with conditions conducive to >> >> cloud formation and with the heaviest contrials being near in or under the >> >> already formed clouds. Just add a little vapor and turbulance to an >> >> unstable [but as yet invisible] boundary area and you get clouds. Fly out >> >> of that boundary area and...no clouds. Fly into another and get clouds >> again. >> >> Vast sections of sky can be conducive to cloud formation and still appear >> >> quite clear. All it takes is just a little more water vapor to make a cloud >> >> there. >> > >> >This is the opposite of what I usually see. You get the trail when they >> are in >> >blue sky, but the trail turns off usually just before entering a cloud, >> and does >> >not turn back on till they are back in blue sky. >> > >> >The trails are in blue sky, almost never near or in the clouds. >> > >> >Now for contrails, I do see the trails get denser when they fly into >> clouds, or >> >near clouds. The effect is just the opposite. But it is easy to tell >> these type >> >of trails usually, they dissipate in a matter of seconds usually and >> minutes at >> >the most. They never make it to the ground like the others do. >> > >> >Marshall >> > >> > >> >-- >> >The silver-list is a moderated forum for discussion of colloidal silver. >> > >> >To join or quit silver-list or silver-digest send an e-mail message to: >> >[email protected] -or- [email protected] >> >with the word subscribe or unsubscribe in the SUBJECT line. >> > >> >To post, address your message to: [email protected] >> >Silver-list archive: http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/index.html >> >List maintainer: Mike Devour <[email protected]> >> > >> > > >
