----- Original Message ----- From: "Robert L. Berger" <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Thursday, August 16, 2001 9:51 PM Subject: Re: CS>Re: Dr. Jon's CS process
> Hi there Quietcove, > > What you THINK makes better quality CS is for the "birds." I merely stated what I observed and was looking for opinions based on others experience, and hopefully testing. I know the topic has been discussed, but I can not find actual test results that have been published on the list. > > Whether its .999 or .99999 the end result is the same. I never said otherwise. > > If you want an answer as to particle size all you have to due is send a sample > to Stephen Quinto and he will do a T.E.M. for only $75.00. That's cheap for the > information that you will get. > > Hanna meters are only good for testing water until you have had several AA or > spectrophotometer ransomed on your process. > > Knowledge is never cheap. All very true. But it is also true that it is often easier to ask a question than to re-invent the wheel. I kind of thought that that is what the list is about. > > I am not really grumpy, it's that I get upset when the information is available > and people wont use it or look for it. If you mean by this that I should have searched the archives, what makes you think that I didn't? What I found was a great deal of speculation on the subject, but no actual figures that were a result of testing, which is what I was looking for. > > "Ole Bob" > > > > > > -- > The silver-list is a moderated forum for discussion of colloidal silver. > > To join or quit silver-list or silver-digest send an e-mail message to: > [email protected] -or- [email protected] > with the word subscribe or unsubscribe in the SUBJECT line. > > To post, address your message to: [email protected] > Silver-list archive: http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/index.html > List maintainer: Mike Devour <[email protected]>
