Here I go again with the Silverlon website... On their product comparison
site, they say this:
"The silver released from the Silverlon® surface is 100% in the ionic (Ag+1)
with no silver released in the metallic nanocrystaline form."
*****************************************************************
Interesting article. At first I though it was going to be a good article,
that was based in fact. However after reading it, it seems apparent that
the
author has not the foggest idea of the difference between Ag0 and Ag+. All
of
the mechanisms he gave for silver resistance were specific for Ag+. But
then
he continued and stated that this resistance is being selected for by uses
of
products that are Ag0. Not likely.
Colloidal silver is Ag0, and is generally considered to be much more
effective
than Ag+ (compounds of silver). The confusion of the two seems to me to be
rather absurd for a researcher.
Anyway, is appears that none of the mechanisms of resistance he shows would
be
a problem for the colloidal part of CS since they are for Ag+ and true
colloidal silver is Ag0.
Marshall
_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp
--
The silver-list is a moderated forum for discussion of colloidal silver.
To join or quit silver-list or silver-digest send an e-mail message to:
[email protected] -or- [email protected]
with the word subscribe or unsubscribe in the SUBJECT line.
To post, address your message to: [email protected]
Silver-list archive: http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/index.html
List maintainer: Mike Devour <[email protected]>
