It is a sore temptation to toot ones own horn especially when someone asks what the best commercially available generator is and a sales op appears to a vendor. It would be very helpful if various people who use various commercial products chime in quickly with their experiences. That way both the pro and cons can come out instead of who is the most pro and everyone else a con. Many people who have bought generators have done extensive research surfing websites, but those websites are usually very biased, so people wind up here to try and weed out some of the sales BS. It might be helpful to have a vendors page where each product is evaluated by an uninvolved expert [or panel of] and includes users comments which could be solicited from listers...not vendors. The only input a vendor would have would be to provide process specifications to be evaluated. No defensive posturing allowed. [especially defense that amounts to attacking a competitor]
Possibly vendors could submit samples to be evaluated too...with permission to publish without recourse...vendor pays reasonable lab costs at an impartial lab. I have tried to do that on my links page, but then, I'm a vendor too and it's hard to be objective. www.silverpuppy.com/links.html Ken > >PS. Regarding list changes I am very much in line with Terry Chamberlin. >Furthermore, I believe that vendors should be able to discuss freely the pros >and cons of various cs products, including their own, so long it is done in a >civil manner. Without these type of educational exchanges the list would >not be the same. > > >-- >The silver-list is a moderated forum for discussion of colloidal silver. > >To join or quit silver-list or silver-digest send an e-mail message to: >[email protected] -or- [email protected] >with the word subscribe or unsubscribe in the SUBJECT line. > >To post, address your message to: [email protected] >Silver-list archive: http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/index.html >List maintainer: Mike Devour <[email protected]> > >
