Guess what? I forgot about your website! It was working on being great last time I looked...even disregarding the portion that...you know.
I decided a while back that I don't really want to sell a LOT of CS generators. I don't want to work 'that' hard. Gee, getting good reviews is almost a threat to my way of life! Anyone who finds me belongs here... glad to see em, no need to search. If no one comes, I get to wander. Win win Ken [ a failure at my lifes ambition...hobo] At 05:39 PM 10/3/01 -0600, you wrote: >Coyote: > >I've been building a standard for the Colloidal Silver Database Website for >quite some time. While it has certainly been an enjoyable project ( and >this will result in a vendor awards page on our website ), very few actually >qualify for consideration. > >You have to be VERY careful when undertaking a list-sponsored project - >there are many aspects to consider. > >Some of the guidelines I've developed... > >Authenticity of information displayed on website from the public's >viewpoint. In our view, even if an incredible "fact" is true, if 80% of >visitors to a website leave with a bad impression, than this hurts colloidal >silver as a whole. Presentation and authenticity is a must. Perception >rules the world, not truth, and the gateway to truth must address >perspectivity. > >Vendor Bashing - If any vendor says their product is the best, without >substantial documentation, reasoning, and CLASS, they are not considered. >Life is governed by dynamics, and these dynamics must be considered if >benefit to the people is truly the motive. > >Component Quality and design consideration - Regardless of the simplicity of >the device ( or the complexity ), rather than choosing one process over >another ( this takes the choice out of the public's hands ), consideration >is given to design and quality. Anything below 18 gauge silver is not >considered, because a vendor, being a "professional", should be able to >achieve a higher standard, and pass this on to customers. Preferred are >rods, because there is a signficant quality difference, and it certainly >increases the happiness of the end user. Balancing this with cost vs. sale >price is considered as well. If someone is charging a fortune for colloidal >silver ( relatively speaking ) they better be supporting a full lab. > >Consideration of Legal Pursuits - Although I admire the mavericks that >recklessly charge forth against the current regimes, because of their >well-founded passion, this is not necessarily in the public's best interest. >If a vendor breaks the law, he'd better fully explain his/her actions, and >fully outline what the law supposedly requires of him/her. That way, 80% of >the visitors don't end up carrying a resentment when they get an education. >If a site still carries the "pre-1938" clause on their site, not only do I >question their commitment to their products, but also their commitment to >responsible honesty. > >Singleness of Purpose - Many vendors sell so many products they can't >possibly keep informed. While I don't view this as bad, it is the pursuit >of excellence that that pushes things beyond current limits. It is our >intention to support these types of people. If multiple products are >carried, an extensive section outlining their colloidal silver views is >required. > >Answering Correspondence - Even in light of the current world structure, we >still believe in personalized customer service, especially in matters of >health. > >Turning over such an endevour to a commitee is a very poor idea. Commitee = >Politics. No committee is necessary if a clear, concise, and posted set of >principles is used to gauge qualifications. The audience will make any >discrepencies cleaer, if given enough information. An auditor can soley be >responsible for addressing suggestions and complaints. If one has problems >with subjective requirements, then one can set up a blind democracy of >parties whom have NO interest in colloidal silver, and a full-vote can be >taken to determine grey areas. > >Strategies for Integrity ( as I call them ) is a wonderful area of thought. >There is incredible room for growth in such managements. > > >----- Original Message ----- >From: "Ode Coyote" <[email protected]> >To: <[email protected]> >Sent: Wednesday, October 03, 2001 2:24 PM >Subject: Re: CS>List Management Redux... Please Read > > >> It is a sore temptation to toot ones own horn especially when someone asks >> what the best commercially available generator is and a sales op appears >to >> a vendor. >> It would be very helpful if various people who use various commercial >> products chime in quickly with their experiences. That way both the pro >> and cons can come out instead of who is the most pro and everyone else a >con. >> Many people who have bought generators have done extensive research >> surfing websites, but those websites are usually very biased, so people >> wind up here to try and weed out some of the sales BS. >> It might be helpful to have a vendors page where each product is >> evaluated by an uninvolved expert [or panel of] and includes users >comments >> which could be solicited from listers...not vendors. > > >-- >The silver-list is a moderated forum for discussion of colloidal silver. > >To join or quit silver-list or silver-digest send an e-mail message to: >[email protected] -or- [email protected] >with the word subscribe or unsubscribe in the SUBJECT line. > >To post, address your message to: [email protected] >Silver-list archive: http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/index.html >List maintainer: Mike Devour <[email protected]> > >
