In a message dated 10/4/2001 1:10:10 PM Eastern Daylight Time, [email protected] writes:
> I question that any vender of any value will not blow his own horn on their > own products, especially if they really have done tests and conduced > trials. These tests and trials can be shared with the list as a list > member. There is no reason to battle. If what you know to be true is true > then it is true. If not then maybe it would be good for all to know that. > But no selling. Herb: I think the major problem here is that we are not even on the threshold of deciding the CRITERIA of what constitutes good or excellent CS. That's why I believe that we will be wasting our time by allowing one vender to debate another about whose CS is best. A much better format is to engage in discussions concerning why certain criteria should be used to distinguish one CS product from another. Let's see the evidence which supports *criteria selection* first. This initial step will probably takes years to establish scientifically. Roger > >
