*grins* Well, think of it this way, Kevin, your money is going to good places ( hopefully! ).
By the way, the phrase "electromagnetic reaction" should never have issued from my fingers. I meant a reaction that causes the isolation of the silver, possibly by the creation of a field. ----- Original Message ----- From: Kevin Nolan To: [email protected] Sent: Friday, October 12, 2001 7:16 AM Subject: Re: CS (Conflicting Statements) Jason wrote: "I cannot help but think the testing done in those examples is anamolous. It COULD feasibly be a byproduct of an electromagnetic reaction that caused an isolation of the silver from "the broth". I am uncertain how this might work with colloidal silver and a nutrient broth, but I have seen such reactions over and over again using healing clays. Rather than view this one study as conclusive, I think a review of Ronald J. Gibbs study on dilution factors is warranted and more trustworthy - mainly because of the great attention to detail that Gibbs applied to his experiments. A dilution factor SHOULD be able to be charted with uniform results, provided the same colloidal silver is used, ie. one starts with a low ppm, studies the efficacy at different dilution levels, then one uses a batch with a slightly higher ppm. If one does this, and the results are not predictable as they should be, then there is evidently another factor that has not been isolated and accounted for. Ronald Gibbs book can be reviewed in pdf format @ http://www.silver-colloids.com/Book/SilverColloids.pdf " Thanks for your input, Jason. Seems even an accredited lab report is not necessarily gospel. Yeah - I bought Gibb's book(let) from Amazon - cost me $50 Australian landed, and took about 30-35 minutes to read through. What value! Found the offer at Frank's site the day after ordering was finalised. That's life.
