is that good or bad?

Ah, well, the debate over the virtues of silver solutions (i.e. silver ions dissolved in water) versus silver colloids (i.e. silver particles suspended in water) is pretty heavy and long-running. Personally, I'm in the colloid camp. All the chemistry I know indicates that as soon as a silver ion hits the stomach and/or the bloodstream, it's going to combine with a chloride ion to form insoluble silver chloride, which will then be excreted, either through the intestinal tract or by the kidneys, depending on where it forms. The ammonia hypothesis is bankrupt. So, AFAIK, virtually all silver ions introduced into the body are wasted. The one place silver ions might (MIGHT!) have some use is topically. Once the water evaporates they'll form silver oxide, which is pretty inactive, but while the water is still there they'll offer more silver activity since there'll be a greater number of ions than particles. I don't know which way the balance will tip, but since the water evaporates pretty quickly without some very special preparations, I'd be inclined to suspect that a true colloid will be more effective.

Anyway, I don't want to get into a flame war or anything, but I'd suggest trying to tip your silver production towards particles -- i.e. towards making a real colloid. In vitro experiments can be constructed to show that silver solutions are more effective, but only if the experiments aren't conducted in blood serum or in a medium resembling blood in all the important respects.



-Paul


--
The silver-list is a moderated forum for discussion of colloidal silver.

To join or quit silver-list or silver-digest send an e-mail message to: [email protected] -or- [email protected]
with the word subscribe or unsubscribe in the SUBJECT line.

To post, address your message to: [email protected]
Silver-list archive: http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/index.html
List maintainer: Mike Devour <[email protected]>