I would just add that non-protocol medicine, and example of which is Y. Omura's Bi-Digital O-Ring Test, offer the only means I know of to determine which therapies, nutritional regimins, and drugs, are most likely to work for a particular patient. Seems to me that non-protocal medicine is the wave of the future.
JBB Duncan Crow wrote: > > Hi Carl; > > I think that allowing a client to "choose" his favourite cancer therapy > would be a serious mistake. Perhaps if he had all the options he could make > an *informed* decision on the appropriateness of a specific therapy. > > Choosing one therapy over another does not take into account that several > therapies may be used simultaneously without interfering with each other, > and the outcome be quicker and more successful for it. The Gerson therapy > for example will help a person detox - OK, and so will ozone. Neither will > interfere with the other. > > Many people are chronocally hypo-oxygenated, and the ozone can correct > cancer a lot faster by re-enabling the DNA repair, than just good breathing > and diet change. Also a secondary contributor to low pH like infection > notably candida will not be thwarted that quickly with diet change, but with > ozone, grapefruit seed extract etc, sure. And low pH will retard a > successful therapy. > > I have the video here from Charlotte Gerson's presentation to the Cancer > Control Society last year. In another presentation, Dr. Donsbach for example > outlines his program, which includes many therapies, not just a couple. He > produces results in 52% of TERMINAL cases. Compare that to the .5% we get in > hospitals. > > I'm not arguing about which cancer therapy is better, just that allowing a > client to choose a therapy may leave too much out for it to be effective. > An informed decision properly selected from the best information we have > should be the rule. > > ciao > > Duncan > > <<< > Even though I am no scientist, I thought I would put my 2 cents in. > I have never had cancer. Hope I never do. But if I ever do contract > cancer, I know that the only treatment I would follow would be the Gerson > therapy. It is basically a juice diet with vitamin/mineral supplements, and > coffee enemas. It is the pre-cursor to the Kelley and Gonzalez therapies. > .......... And he could use this diet to correct not only cancer, but a lot > of other diseases, because this diet would "clean" the body of the "toxins" > in the body. It would "normalize" the body chemistry. I think it was > claimed that he "cured" 75-80% of cancer patients that the AMA type doctors > had failed to cure. ........But his practice is carried on by his daughter, > Charolette Gerson, down in Mexico. For anyone who is interested, her website > is http://www.gerson.org/ > Anyway, what I am leading up to is that in my opinon, the only thing > that can heal the body is the body itself. If you put the right nutrients > into the body ( that is the food that the body is biologically adapted to -- > for man, fruits and vegetables), and stop putting in the other poisons, the > body will heal itself. Even of cancer --if it is not too far advanced. And > the fastest way to put in fruits and vegetables into the body is thrugh > juicing. > >>>> > > -- > The silver-list is a moderated forum for discussion of colloidal silver. > > To join or quit silver-list or silver-digest send an e-mail message to: > [email protected] -or- [email protected] > with the word subscribe or unsubscribe in the SUBJECT line. > > To post, address your message to: [email protected] > Silver-list archive: http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/index.html > List maintainer: Mike Devour <[email protected]>
