Thanks to everyone who has made an input on the big C question; in
particular to Jason, Duncan and Ivan. Encouraging when folks give of their
time so generously. Some great stuff to chew over. However time I think to
preempt Mike and wind up the various threads. My own conclusions: Prevention
is certainly to be preferred over cure - get and stay alkaline comes through
as a must. Also to aim for more raw food in the diet. On the cure side,
seems safe to say there is no single protocol, but at least a narrowed range
of preferences. I would certainly want to avoid the conventional cut, burn
and poison approach, even though that does obviously work for some. An
interesting and rare example where conventional medicine seems to have
adopted an enlightened approach is use of (if I recall correctly) a
particular form of vitamin A to treat with something like a 95+% success
rate, a particular form of leukaemia.

Kevin Nolan

----- Original Message -----
From: "Jonathan B. Britten" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Tuesday, April 09, 2002 1:56 PM
Subject: Re: CS>Cancer: cause and cure


> I would just add that non-protocol medicine, and example of which is Y.
> Omura's Bi-Digital O-Ring Test,  offer the only means I know of to
> determine which therapies, nutritional regimins, and drugs, are most
> likely to work for a particular patient.   Seems to me that non-protocal
> medicine is the wave of the future.
>
> JBB
>
>
>
> Duncan Crow wrote:
> >
> > Hi Carl;
> >
> > I think that allowing a client to "choose" his favourite cancer therapy
> > would be a serious mistake. Perhaps if he had all the options he could
make
> > an *informed* decision on the appropriateness of a specific therapy.
> >
> > Choosing one therapy over another does not take into account that
several
> > therapies may be used simultaneously without interfering with each
other,
> > and the outcome be quicker and more successful for it. The Gerson
therapy
> > for example will help a person detox - OK, and so will ozone.  Neither
will
> > interfere with the other.
> >
> > Many people are chronocally hypo-oxygenated, and the ozone can correct
> > cancer a lot faster by re-enabling the DNA repair, than just good
breathing
> > and diet change. Also a secondary contributor to low pH like infection
> > notably candida will not be thwarted that quickly with diet change, but
with
> > ozone,  grapefruit seed extract etc, sure. And low pH will retard a
> > successful therapy.
> >
> > I have the video here from Charlotte Gerson's presentation to the Cancer
> > Control Society last year. In another presentation, Dr. Donsbach for
example
> > outlines his program, which includes many therapies, not just a couple.
He
> > produces results in 52% of TERMINAL cases. Compare that to the .5% we
get in
> > hospitals.
> >
> > I'm not arguing about which cancer therapy is better, just that allowing
a
> > client to choose a therapy may leave too much out for it to be
effective.
> > An informed decision properly selected from the best information we have
> > should be the rule.
> >
> > ciao
> >
> > Duncan
> >
> > <<<
> > Even though I am no scientist, I thought I would put my 2 cents in.
> >     I have never had cancer. Hope I never do. But if I ever do contract
> > cancer, I know that the only treatment I would follow would be the
Gerson
> > therapy. It is basically a juice diet with vitamin/mineral supplements,
and
> > coffee enemas. It is the pre-cursor to the Kelley and Gonzalez
therapies.
> > .......... And he could use this diet to correct not only cancer, but a
lot
> > of other diseases, because this diet would "clean" the body of the
"toxins"
> > in the body.  It would "normalize" the body chemistry.  I think it was
> > claimed that he "cured" 75-80% of cancer patients that the AMA type
doctors
> > had failed to cure.  ........But his practice is carried on by his
daughter,
> > Charolette Gerson, down in Mexico. For anyone who is interested, her
website
> > is http://www.gerson.org/
> >     Anyway, what I am leading up to  is that in my opinon, the only
thing
> > that can heal the body is the body itself. If you put the right
nutrients
> > into the body ( that is the food that the body is biologically adapted
to --
> > for man, fruits and vegetables), and stop putting in the other poisons,
the
> > body will heal itself. Even of cancer --if it is not too far advanced.
And
> > the fastest way to put in fruits and vegetables into the body is thrugh
> > juicing.
> > >>>>
> >
> > --
> > The silver-list is a moderated forum for discussion of colloidal silver.
> >
> > To join or quit silver-list or silver-digest send an e-mail message to:
> > [email protected]  -or-  [email protected]
> > with the word subscribe or unsubscribe in the SUBJECT line.
> >
> > To post, address your message to: [email protected]
> > Silver-list archive: http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/index.html
> > List maintainer: Mike Devour <[email protected]>
>