If you want dose and mix specifics, you'd better ask Jason or one of the other directly involved with the patient side of things. I just make it. [and , uh, sell generators to make it] My personal dose meter goes like this... Humm, feeling OK. Take sip and swish...ah STRONG stuff..one gulp or three? Glug. Umm, a bit off kilter today...glug glug glug. Got a cold? substitute CS for water and inhale as much as i don't get bored with all day long.
If you'd die from water toxicity before reaching any sort of toxic dose of silver [at under 50PPM], and a little does the job...what's to worry about? There's about a 5000 ft range for intuition to play around in. Caution says take a few days off now and then, whatever works is enough and more than enough is not always better. Ken At 01:06 PM 7/30/02 -0500, you wrote: >Ode Coyote, > >You are obviously VERY well educated on CS! I agree on the generator aspect >and regularly generate my own which I have consume copiously. As the >progressive dialogue has indicated though, what is the actual strength, ppm, >particle size of any of our final product? I did not know. > >Also, when looking to achieve a desired result, who is to determine what is >realistic? I decided 6 months of heavy consumption of CS was not going to >give me the desired results and that better was possible! > >Then too, I'm sort of squeamish about what I put in my veins. > >Another consideration I had was that my research told me that DMSO and >heparin would be advantageous additives to mix with the infusion medium. >Might be able to get sterile DMSO without a prescription from somewhere. >However, the Heparin is a prescription item. > >There again, when it comes to putting it in the vein, I was not confident >enough to trust my judgement on what ratio of the components was best. > >I am a nurse so I understand enough to know that a doctor must consider the >CYA aspect. Also, I liked the idea of having a doctor inhouse/onhand and >prepared to intervene if necessary. > >Additionally, in my situation, I knew that my life was very definitely >slipping away and the ball was going to remain in my court. I made what I >believed then and still believe was the right choice for me. And I think >that is what each of us is attempting to do, don't you. > >Could my own formula have worked as well? Might have, but I did not have >the comfort zone or confidence to take the chance. So, I expended the >$$$$'s for a product that I had researched and had confidence in. The >important thing is that I did get extraordinary results! > >Without a doubt, there are medicine professionals who are just out to make a >buck, but I believe the doctor that treated me believed in the protocols he >established for my condition. > >After three and a half years of getting progressively worse, and being a >firm believer in the law of averages, I decided to go for it boldly with >expectations of success rather than be in limbo wondering if and when the >perfect formula would surface. > >Was my success story the result of a placebo effect, a fluke, or a doctor >who was thinking "out of the box"? Could have been any of those, but I have >faith in this doctor as a compassionate healer and because my instincts said >to go for it. My instincts have served me well over the years so I went >into my treatment expecting good results. > >Now, I would appreciate you telling me your formula so I can tap into your >knowledge! I will continue to use CS for maintenance > >Once again, may I add that I have certainly learned a great deal from this >forum. Thanks to yourself and many others for sharing information honestly >and open. > >Respectfully, >Barbara > > > > > > > > > > >----- Original Message ----- >From: d.linen <[email protected]> >To: <[email protected]> >Sent: Monday, July 29, 2002 11:05 PM >Subject: Re: CS>Intravenous CS > > >> Ken, >> >> Your email is arriving from the 'future', November 29, 2002. >> >> d/ >> >> Ode Coyote wrote: >> > >> > The big advantage to making your own is, even if you lay out $150 for a >well made generator or use some effort to construct your own for very >little, it's a lot cheaper in the long run than anyones premade CS prices >and quality can be as good as most..and better than some. >> > If a $75 generator will make 30 gallons at 20 PPM and another 30 gallons >with the replacement of the electrodes for $10..you figure the difference >between 120ccs at $50. >> > >> > With a bit of work, research and experimentation, you can do the same >thing for around $15. >> > The most costly part of colloidal silver is the water. >> > Ken >> > >> > At 08:38 PM 7/28/02 EDT, you wrote: >> > >>>> >> > >> > In a message dated 7/27/2002 10:58:46 PM Eastern Daylight Time, >[email protected] writes: >> > >> > <<The cost for Silver 400 from the manufacturer is $50 for 120 >cc's. Cheaper for doctors and veterinarians. >> > >> > If at first this cost seems excessive, please take into >consideration that for instance, I started at 30 cc's and built up to 65. >The oral maintenance dose is one quarter to one half tsp. daily.>> >> > >> > How many teaspoons would be in the 50 dollars worth? Is the same >silver taken orally and also by iv? >> > I imagine this silver is ionic since it's being injected. >> > >> > For oral use, is this silver better than others? If one had to take >a couple of tablespoons a day for a few months, I would like to know what it >would cost per week. >> > My boyfriend has Hepatitis C and needs to start trying this, but >there's no point in starting it if he can't keep it up due to cost. >> > >> > Summer >> > >> > <<<< >> > >> > -- The silver-list is a moderated forum for discussion of colloidal >silver. >> > Instructions for unsubscribing may be found at: http://silverlist.org >> > To post, address your message to: [email protected] >> > Silver-list archive: http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/index.html >> > List maintainer: Mike Devour >> >> > >
