>
> To switch gears a bit, what do you think of a case of Lyme disease that
> wasn't diagnosed for some 6 months after the onset of symptoms and has yet
> to exhibit the Lyme virus?

Lyme is not a virus, but a spirochete bacteria.  It is pretty well normal to
have lyme for 6 months or a year before the tests show positive, if ever. I
think the tests are worse than nothing, since they have been known to give false
negatives over 50% of the time, delaying treatment until severe damage has
occurred.  I had lyme and it took a year to convince the doctors, and the tests
NEVER came back positive, even though I was bitten by a tick when visiting
Conn., and it developed the spot and everything, and I got sick shortly after
that and had all the classical symptoms.  Unfortunately because of the stupid
tests that are wrong over 50% of the time, I could not get treatment until I was
on crutches, and instead of $3.00 worth of penicillin it took $6,000 worth of IV
followed by a bunch of CS to defeat.

>  This person was treated aggressively with
> antibiotics and eventually with CS.  At a stand still currently with some
> neurological deficits.
>

Neurological can be caused by the bacteria actually getting in the brain.  That
is much more difficult to treat, and oral antibiotics and CS will not reach it.
Instead it required IV antibiotics or the use of the other parts of the Beck
Protocol.  Ozonated water and the pulser can get to them there.

Marshall


--
The silver-list is a moderated forum for discussion of colloidal silver.

Instructions for unsubscribing may be found at: http://silverlist.org

To post, address your message to: [email protected]

Silver-list archive: http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/index.html

List maintainer: Mike Devour <[email protected]>