harvey norris wrote: > --- Ron <[email protected]> wrote: > > Unprecedented Historical Documentation of Colloidal > > "Collosols" Silver > > > > Scientific American, Volume 78, Page 2 & 3 - > > 1914 > > > > > > Scientific American Supplement No. 2009 - July 4, > > 1914 > > On Metallic Colloids and Their Bactericidal > > Properties* > > > > The History of Collosols - By Henry Crookes > > > "One method, known as Bredig's method, of effecting > > this result was by using a high-tension disruptive > > electric spark under water, between poles of the > > metal to be dealt with. Solutions containing an > > almost incredible number of particles of metal were > > prepared by these means, and it was soon found that > > these liquids had a very high germicidal power." > > > Does this imply that high voltage methods using > underwater arcing makes a "better CS product?"
Not necessarily. I think the electrolytic method was only discovered in the last decade or so. > I > thought that arcing itself added bad things such as > nitrates? There should be no nitrogen in the water, so arcing under water should not add any nitrates. > However ozone has been proven healthful, > whereby an arc should add ozone. I don't believe so. It would have to split the water into hydrogen and oxygen, then 3 independent oxygens find each other to make ozone. The hydrogen has great affinity for oxygen, so if any reaction took place it would be for the hydrogen and oxygen to recombine into water. > Must we be limited to > battery DC methods for safe CS product? How many folks > are using NST's (Neon Sign transformers to make their > products, and do you use AC and not DC? HDN I use NST's, but do not arc. Marshall -- The silver-list is a moderated forum for discussion of colloidal silver. Instructions for unsubscribing may be found at: http://silverlist.org To post, address your message to: [email protected] Silver-list archive: http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/index.html List maintainer: Mike Devour <[email protected]>
