List, I also have excellent results with the SG6, and found the Hannah meter I ordered with it to be quite accurate, with results very close to those cited in the pamphlet and web site.
I noticed from the very start the VERY strong taste of silver, much more so than with the old Robey machine (maker of many sparklies and vast quantities of sludge). This raises an interesting question for the bona fide scientists among us (I am an amateur): if the CS is almost 100% ionic, as F. Key has supposedly stated, then taste itself is based at least on part on recognition of atoms rather than molecules. If this is true, I had never known it. It would be interesting if, in the final analysis, taste proved to be a more reliable measure of ion/particle ration than either high-tech measurement we have discussed here! JBB Jack Dayton wrote: > > > From: "[email protected]" <[email protected]> > > Date: Thu, 19 Sep 2002 14:38:30 -0700 (PDT) > > To: [email protected] > > Resent-From: [email protected] > > > HI I just wanted to add the following. When one looks > > at the pictures from http://silvergen.com/toppage2.htm > > it seems to me that the SG6 which I am taking as a > > slower type of method to producing the silver looks > > liker the particles are a lot more uniform and smaller > ************************ > > Hi Corbin, I use the SG6, and am very satisfied > with the resultsI am getting. > > I make 44oz batches and get shutdown in about > One and one half hours, with the dial set about > midway. The result is CLEAR and stays that way > for about 2 weeks ( I drink 2 ozs first thing in > the morning on an empty stomach). > > Jack > > -- > The silver-list is a moderated forum for discussion of colloidal silver. > > Instructions for unsubscribing may be found at: http://silverlist.org > > To post, address your message to: [email protected] > > Silver-list archive: http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/index.html > > List maintainer: Mike Devour <[email protected]>
