Jim:

That's really interesting.  In fact, fascinating.

It's hard to argue with measured observations, so instead I'd like to ask a few 
questions!

What kind of water is it that you are using?  From the conversation, my initial 
understanding is that it is tap water.  However, most tap water I've had 
experience with would test "off the chart" on a PWT meter.  You give ending 
measurements at about 15 - 20 uS.  Am I to assume that the process you are 
using does in fact precipitate out all dissolved solids?

Have you playing with magnets again?  *j/k*

The fact that the ionic portion of the CS levels off is not so surprising to 
me.  Slowing the reaction down ( this is in regards to distilled water ) can 
increase the ionic content by reducing agglomeration, allowing one to achieve a 
higher concentration of silver ions through "proper hydration" of the ions ( 
for lack of a more suitable term ).  However, the result of the measurement of 
silver ions stabilizing usually means that agglomeration is occuring, easily 
gauged by the laser.

So pray tell Jim - how are you stablizing the reaction?

As far as pool water goes, I can only guess at effective concentrations.  
Someone else may have more definitive data.  I would start with a beginning 
concentration of .5 - 1 PPM and begin monitoring growth in the water.  One 
shouldn't need anywhere near the end concentration needed to fight an infection 
in the human body, or as high as would be needed in a bacterial friendly 
environment ( such as waste ).  If chlorine is being used in the water, the 
idea would be to taper it off.

Of course, the greatest challenge is measuring everything, including the total 
silver concentration in the water and organism growth.  I know that quite a few 
people simply gauge by lack of algae growth, but I'd be more comfortable with 
actual testing of the water at different stages.

Kind Regards,


Jason
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Jim Meissner 
  To: [email protected] 
  Sent: Tuesday, October 08, 2002 12:07 PM
  Subject: Re: CS>CS Tap Water


  Dear Jason:

  Thank you for your reply.  Just like you I try to be very careful and attempt 
to research things before blindly following "standard methods".  I purchased 
several brands of generators and also built "kits" from the available 
information.  I was not satisfied with the somewhat "uncontrolled" results.  It 
seems that with the 27 volt method, 90% of the product is produced in the last 
10% of time and if you are not watching carefully you will have either "mostly" 
pure water or "mud" and silver flakes floating on top of the water.  Since I 
like to measure things, I bought the Hanna PWT and Laser from Trem and did some 
research. 

  I have come up with a method that self limits the concentration of silver 
ions to about 15 uS as measured with the Hanna PWT.  Even after 5 days of 
brewing, the concentration stays below 20 uS and there is very little Tindel as 
shown by the Laser.  What does happen is that as the concentration increases, 
the silver ions plate back out onto the negative silver electrode.

  >  However, the increased conductivity of tap water causes the reaction to 
start out of control immediately.  
  >  This greatly increases the actual amount of silver deposited into the 
water.
    
  So, let us say that your above statement does not apply.  ( Please feel free 
to argue this if you like. )

  Then what would you say?  

  Would this be a good method of purifying water by precipitation of solids and 
disinfecting the swimmers?  I would prefer using silver instead of chlorine 
unless there are some negative factors.  What would be a proper dilution, 10 to 
1?


  Juergen P. (Jim) Meissner
  Check out my Website at www.MeissnerResearch.com
  Read about the benefits of the Brain State Synchronizer sounds for improving 
your life and health.


    ----- Original Message ----- 
    From: SilverMedicine.org 
    To: [email protected] 
    Sent: Tuesday, October 08, 2002 8:35 AM
    Subject: Re: CS>CS Tap Water


    Jim:

    Who knows what compounds are made in such a process.  However, the 
increased conductivity of tap water causes the reaction to start out of control 
immediately.  This greatly increases the actual amount of silver deposited into 
the water.  As with using saline solution as a primer, a great deal of silver 
will remain in the "solution".  The end result is a poorer quality product with 
"too much" actual silver content.

    It wouldn't surprise me if one discovered that metallic silver was actually 
plating out in the process, in small quantities of course.

    Jason
      ----- Original Message ----- 
      From: Jim Meissner 
      To: [email protected] 
      Sent: Sunday, October 06, 2002 6:44 PM
      Subject: Re: CS>CS Tap Water


      Dear Jason:

      I do know how to make CS with distilled water.  I use low voltage and 
current limiting.  It is about 15 uS as measured on a PWT and has low Tindell 
as shown with the laser.

       But, I have experimented making CS with tap water which in my case is 
well water.  I have been reluctant to drink it though.  Do you think that the 
process causes silver to be electroplated onto the mineral content of the well 
water?  I seem to get a brown residue in the bottom of the jar and a thin black 
coating or plating on the sides of the jar.  Does this mean that I am 
precipitating the minerals in the water?   I am undecided whether this is good 
or bad.  

      What do you think?

      Juergen P. (Jim) Meissner
      Check out my Website at www.MeissnerResearch.com
      Read about the benefits of the Brain State Synchronizer sounds for 
improving your life and health.


        ----- Original Message ----- 
        From: SilverMedicine.org 
        To: [email protected] 
        Sent: Saturday, October 05, 2002 10:15 AM
        Subject: CS>CS Tap Water


        Diane/all:

        There's nothing wrong with taking isolated silver and adding it tap 
water;
        the issue in question would be whether tap water was used during 
production.
        There are plenty of salts in the body to convert silver ions into silver
        chloride.  Not adding CS to tapwater is not going to make one bit of
        difference.  In fact, silver ions are not going to get out of the body 
as
        ions, period.  At some point, most if not all ions will be converted to
        salts or proteins, and perhaps reconverted to ions, then back to any 
number
        of possible compounds.

        To think anything else is nothing more or less than unclear thinking.  
What
        happens between point A ( drinking CS ) and point Z ( the silver either
        exits the body in particulate/compound form or is deposited in the body 
in
        particulate/compound form ) is the "miracle" of CS.

        The point I've been trying to make for several years now is that not
        everyone is at equal risk for Argyria.  Joe can take CS for thirty 
years and
        have no problem.  Joe builds a website that says it is completely 
non-toxic,
        add a pinch of salt in the production process because we are 
impatient...
        Then, six people get Argyria between 5 and 15 years down the road.

        I'm betting the candidate used salt in the production process, as he 
was not
        even aware of the term Argyria...  Judging from the date, he probably 
used
        Metcalf's instructions on CS generation ( or some derived from Metcalf's
        work ).

        Like I said on a post earlier this year, lawyers are already listing
        colloidal silver as a topic for lawsuits.  Those manufacturers who do 
not
        educate their customers on the risk because they don't feel the risk is
        there may be getting some surprises down the road.  It's hard to know
        because it is impossible to truly know how people are using products.

        I've been working on some theoretical programs for quite awhile to 
reduce
        the risk of Argyria.... This for those with terminal illness who for
        whatever reason need to be on colloidal silver long term, taking amounts
        exceeding eight ounces daily of 10PPM CS.

        While on topic, I also have a problem with the SilverFacts page on this
        issue, as the site simply plays the propaganda game on the other side 
of the
        coin.

        As far as whether or not cosmetic argyria is a real issue, I deal with
        people on both sides of the coin... Those who could really care less, 
and
        those who have a lot to lose as they make a living on their appearance.

        I still do not believe that taking sane mounts of quality, "isolated"
        colloidal silver places one at risk.  I keep my own silver intake well 
below
        the EPA established guidelines for lifetime consumption of silver.

        However, I would like to comment on one more issue:  By the time silver
        starts to deposit in the skin, it will likely have already started
        depositing in organs.  When the skin, fingernails, and hair start to 
show
        signs of a condition, it is a warning that the elimination system is not
        functioning properly.  Dehydration is probably the first place to look. 
 The
        body's ph levels are likely a good second place to look.

        Best Regards,

        Jason