And I assume you are only talking abut buffered GSH? Also what do you mean by "This has been in the medical > research for years." Sorry, I only know that in Cystic Fibrosis this is kind of research on the age, so I would be very surprised if other people with lung problems have inhaled GSH for years?
Maia --- Duncan Crow <[email protected]> wrote: > > Right, just checking for a loose end - > Oral glutathione is wasteful. GSH is absorbed at > less than 10% orally but > breathing it via aerosol you do get good local-only > absorption in the > lungs or sinuses. This has been in the medical > research for years. > Imagine the good it would do if the people didn't > waste 90% of their > glutathione increase. > > I treat the whole client by giving the precursors > and allowing the cells > to do their job and produce their own. Then you > don't miss any cells. > > cheers > > Duncan Crow > > > As for the GSH - taking it orally is not.. clear. > I > > mean there are pros and cons, something to do with > the > > fact that when taken orally it doesn't go into the > > cells but stays outside (which for some reason is > not > > good for CF). There are CF people that use it > orally > > with success, but others are sceptical. > > > > -- > The silver-list is a moderated forum for discussion > of colloidal silver. > > Instructions for unsubscribing may be found at: > http://silverlist.org > > To post, address your message to: > [email protected] > > Silver-list archive: > http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/index.html > > List maintainer: Mike Devour <[email protected]> > __________________________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Yahoo! Tax Center - File online, calculators, forms, and more http://tax.yahoo.com
