Marshall, "if I did not remove any reference to anything true about CS, I would be fined $10,000 a day."
Does this mean that you would be OK with them if you used "qualifying phrases" such as "it is widely believed" and so on? Arnold ----- Original Message ----- From: "Marshall Dudley" <[email protected]> To: <[email protected]> Sent: Saturday, June 21, 2003 5:30 PM Subject: Re: CS>Re: FTC seizes Seasilver > Or maybe they are following the advise of a lawyer that has the notion that the > Federal government has to follow the laws. I had my site approved by an attorney > and doctor who said that there was nothing illegal on it and the government could > not do anything about it, only to get a letter from the FTC saying that if I did > not remove any reference to anything true about CS, I would be fined $10,000 a > day. > > Marshall > > [email protected] wrote: > > > > Do you imply that this may have been a set-up for a precedent to get others? > > No, my first thought was maybe Seasilver, for whatever reason, WANTS to > > be a > > test-case, as they were clearly warned and there's very big bucks > > involved. > > So far, it just does not make sense, especially to the 400+ laid-off > > employees. > > A publicity stunt? Puzzling. This geographic area is also home to some > > major players in pharms and gene research. > > jr > > > > -- > > The silver-list is a moderated forum for discussion of colloidal silver. > > > > Instructions for unsubscribing may be found at: http://silverlist.org > > > > To post, address your message to: [email protected] > > > > Silver-list archive: http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/index.html > > > > List maintainer: Mike Devour <[email protected]>
