My doctor, along with natural immunogenics and I have been working on
establishing protocols.  I have personally had IV's of CS in June and July
2002, and again this past June and July.  It has been great in regards to my
MS.
Nancy
----- Original Message -----
From: "James Holmes" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2003 9:27 AM
Subject: RE: CS>Re: [sillver_list] Re: CS>Re: Nebulizing CS for SARS Redux


>
> Hello Jason,
>
> Yes,  It is one thing to theorize at a distance; another to stand there
> looking at the terribly ill person and weigh all the factors.
>
> Does anyone know if IV CS is against established protocols? Vets have used
> it successfully against Eastern Equine Encephalitis.   Two 1500 ml doses
of
> 15 ppm. The horse lived, with no apparent neuro damage.
>
> JOH
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jason Eaton [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2003 6:59 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: CS>Re: [sillver_list] Re: CS>Re: Nebulizing CS for SARS Redux
>
>
>
> Hi James:
>
> Yes, there is no reason that CS cannot be added to electrolytes already
> being given ( that I am aware of ).  In fact, some MD's utilize CS
combined
> WITH antibiotics.
>
> Saline is not ideal to use as a buffer, although I have not yet been able
to
> figure out what is being used in its place. ( It is acceptable though ).
>
> Even dead bacteria can be dangerous when injected into the bloodstream.
The
> air is nowhere near sterile.
>
> I am not aware of the same concerns being an issue intramuscularly.
>
> Oral use of CS, I agree, would be a precursor to IV use in the ideal
> situation.
>
> MD's do not have the legal right to act against established methods, even
in
> acts of desperation.  It may be alright for an MD to utilize silver in a
> case of desperation, but even if signed consent forms are signed, and a
> doctor ignores established protocols, it can still be viewed as criminal
> malpractice.  Knowingly injecting an improperly prepared substance into
the
> bloodstream is such a situation.
>
> I'm all for nebulizing in the face of any airborne infection.  However,
I'm
> not under the same constraints that MD's would be in in a hospital
> environment.
>
> For some reason, doctors, even those experienced in alt med methods ( even
> those who utilize h2o2 IV therapy ) are very intimidated by silver use via
> IV.  Like anything else, I suppose, it would just take some experience and
> walking through the uncomfort zone.
>
> Best Regards,
>
> Jason
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "James Holmes" <[email protected]>
> To: <[email protected]>
> Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2003 10:48 PM
> Subject: RE: CS>Re: [sillver_list] Re: CS>Re: Nebulizing CS for SARS Redux
>
>
> > Comments in Trem's text.  These speculations are offered as questions
> > for discussion, not assertions.
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Jason Eaton [mailto:[email protected]]
> > Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2003 8:04 PM
> > To: [email protected]
> > Subject: Re: CS>Re: [sillver_list] Re: CS>Re: Nebulizing CS for SARS
> > Redux
> >
> >
> >
> > Trem:
> >
> > There are quite a few factors you are not accounting for:
> >
> > 1.  Distilled water injected into the bloodstream can cause shock
> > leading
> to
> > death.  The Sol must be titrated properly; it must be prepared
> > properly.
> >
> >   JOH Why not add it to any electrolytes already being given or give
> Ringers
> > and CS?
> >
> > Why not just make it isotonic with salt, if the volume is low enough
> > and prepared electrolyte solutions are not available?
> >
> > 2.  A product that is not certified pyrogen free can easily cause
> > death in someone who is already sick.  It is not enough that a sol be
> > sterile, it cannot have any endotoxin or any substances that may
> > induce a immune response.
> >
> > JOH A product that is not pyrogen free, certified or not, can be
> > deadly. I  How do pyrogens 1, get into carefully made batches of CS,
> > 2. If pathogens are present, none have been demonstrated to survive
> > even concentrations as low as 0.002 PPM (From distant memory,
> > check for yourself)  How will they survive 5 PPM and up?
> > Sterile equipment is a given.
> >
> > 3.  Silver injected into the bloodstream is incredibly potent.  If an
> > MD does not have the experience in this, hesitation can certainly be
> > understandable.
> >
> > JOH  I agree that to be a serious problem with advanced systemic
> > infection of an endotoxin type. Perhaps a protocol can be suggested
> > based on the kill rates in broth compared with the success against
> > that organism in people.  Perhaps an initially cautious beginning:  a
> > very small amount by mouth leading up to larger I V doses when the
> > first kill debris has been processed.  It is incredibly potent, and in
> > dosages that are an order of magnitude or two, below toxicity.
> >
> > 4.  Any of the above, if done by an MD, may easily constitute criminal
> > malpractice.  In the US, such an MD without proper justification could
> > easily do federal time.
> >
> > JOH  Not only that, they might hurt somebody.  Don't doctors in
> > desperate situations have license to do whatever they think may help
> > that they are qualified to administer?  If not, by whom and for what
> > purpose?
> >
> > If---big if, it could be practically demonstrated [That's not the same
> > as jumping through all the hoops] that SARS cannot live in 5-15 PPM
> > CS, then there would be no reason to not nebulize; any overspray will
> > help
> disinfect
> > the environment and all fomites it touches.
> >
> > Best Regards,
> >
> > Jason
> >
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Trem" <[email protected]>
> > To: <[email protected]>
> > Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2003 6:17 PM
> > Subject: CS>Re: [sillver_list] Re: CS>Re: Nebulizing CS for SARS Redux
> >
> >
> > > Hi Catherine,
> > >
> > > I may be missing something here.  If so, please excuse me.  If
> > > deionized
> > or
> > > distilled water is used in injections and silver is benign, why is
> > > it not
> > a
> > > no brainer to inject properly made CS intravenously as a trial
> > > protocol?
> > It
> > > seems that it would be immediately known to the casual observer if
> > > the patient was getting any better since silver works so quickly.
> > > It also
> > seems
> > > to me the blood titer would show a decrease in SARS almost
> > > immediately
> > which
> > > would be the definitive answer.  If one used a mix of standard CS
> > > which is normally composed of 70-90% ions and the remainder being
> > > colloids, it
> > would
> > > cover the bases of which is effective since both would be
> > > circulating in
> > the
> > > system.  It wouldn't matter which did the job of they were to see a
> > decrease
> > > in viral load and/or the patient responded favorably.
> > >
> > > Mikes idea of using predominantly ionic silver which his process
> > > seems to produce doesn't carry as much weight with me as he seems to
> > > think it does. An ion is an ion and the ions he produces cannot be
> > > any different than an ion any device produces.  The major difference
> > > can only be the ratio of
> > ions
> > > to particles and the size of the particles.  If the mix is made
> > > using a
> > good
> > > process, it will always be crystal clear indicating the colloids are
> > within
> > > the small range of being colorless.
> > >
> > > As Bob Lee once pointed out there are about 1.41252 X 10+18 atoms in
> > > one teaspoon of CS made to 20+ PPM.  I would think it wouldn't take
> > > too much
> > in
> > > an intravenous solution to see some dramatic results.
> > >
> > > And let's remember, an IV of distilled water isn't going to do any
> > > damage
> > so
> > > why wouldn't someone try this just to see if it works?  Or as I said
> > > earlier, is there something I missed.
> > >
> > > Best regards,
> > >
> > > Trem
> > >
> > > >
> > > >   I became involved with this group and actually had the
> > > > opportunity to present CS to them during a conference call.  At
> > > > that time, my thoughts
> > > were
> > > > running along the lines of nebulizing.
> > > >
> > > >   Since then, they've considered oral (very difficult because most
> > > patients
> > > > are too ill to drink) and IV.  They are really skeptical about the
> > latter
> > > > because I can't produce enough material that speaks of efficacy
> > > > with
> > this.
> > > >
> > > >> Regards,
> > > > Catherine
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > The silver-list is a moderated forum for discussion of colloidal
> > > > silver.
> > > >
> > > > Instructions for unsubscribing may be found at:
> > > > http://silverlist.org
> > > >
> > > > To post, address your message to: [email protected]
> > > >
> > > > Silver-list archive:
> > > > http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/index.html
> > > >
> > > > List maintainer: Mike Devour <[email protected]>
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>