url: http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/m60357.html
Re: CS>Re: Nebulizing CS for SARS Redux
From: C Creel
Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2003 17:32:04
> Dear Mike,
[...]
> I became involved with this group and actually had the opportunity
> to present CS to them during a conference call. At that time, my
> thoughts were running along the lines of nebulizing.
> Since then, they've considered oral (very difficult because most
> patients are too ill to drink) and IV. They are really skeptical
> about the latter because I can't produce enough material that
> speaks of efficacy with this.
> Thanks for your input, Mike.
> Regards,
> Catherine
Perhaps this may help give some more documentation that is needed.
I was in a severe mold environment that compromised my immune
system. Previous to this, I never had reason to visit doctors, was
never hospitalized, and any injury healed very quickly.
It took a long time to realize the effects the mold was having on my
body. By then it was too late.
One of the effects is I got Shingles.
Shingles is due to the chickenpox virus eveyone has as a child.
Medicine has no cure against it. The remedies that are recommended
have serious side effects.
About 20 percent of the population of my age gets Shingles, but it
is unheard of in my family. I am the only one to have experienced
it.
I started taking cs as soon as I found what it was. I posted a
detailed report (warning - unpleasant photos)
http://www.geocities.com/mrmonett/shingles/0shin.htm
(Since then, Yahoo bought Geocities and my password no longer works.
I cannot update that page.)
The cs that I made was effective against the Shingles. But it came
back.
This is not unusual, especially when the immune system is
compromised.
The cs that I made according to the specifications on my web page
no longer had any effect.
I increased the dosage by increasing the brew time to 1 hr, then to
1.5 hr. The Shingles remained. The scabs would not go away, and the
infection sites were very painful.
In conjunction with another project, I tried three different methods
of stirring. My motivation was to reduce the need for constantly
cleaning the electrodes and the the glass that held the cs.
To my surprise, the Shingles got worse. The scabs started bleeding,
which never happened before, and the cavities in my teeth hurt much
sooner. This cs lasted only several hours before another dose was
needed.
A friend who moved in with me around the same time reported the same
result on her cavities. Stirring did not work for her either, so I
abandoned stirring.
However, her family lives in Moldavia. She knew what cs could do,
and she wanted to send a cs generator to her brother.
The 160VDC system described on my web page would not be suitable. I
started looking for a simple low voltage system, perhaps running off
a single 9V battery.
If it could be made to work, there are many ways to get power. A 12V
car battery would work, a standard Wallwart power supply, or even
used 1.5V alkalines from a boombox. I posted my goals to the list,
then started working on the problem on a Thursday.
The challenge was to figure out how to get enough Coulombs
transferred from a low voltage supply in a reasonable time.
The solution was to increase the wetted area by folding the 12 ga
wire into a "W", then finding the series resistance needed to
approximate a constant current source. I can show the equations and
derivations needed in a separate post, but it is not important to
this topic.
I made a great deal of black and gray sludge that weekend. By
Monday, I finally figured out what was happening with the mist and
the invisible ion cloud. My interpretation of the ion cloud density
is posted in other ULVDC threads.
But the astonishing thing was the first trial of the new cs.
I am sceptical of anything new, and did not gulp it down as I
normally do. The first test was only a mouthfull on that Monday.
The following Wednesday, the Shingles scabs fell off. I have
reported this in other ULVDC posts.
I cannot tell you how surprised I was.
Now, the Shingles scabs are gone, the cavities are silent, and
nobody has cold sores anymore.
According to references in a previous post, cold sores are easiest
to kill, Herpes genital viruses are next, and Shingles viruses are
the most difficult. The cs made at 87 uA/sq. in killed the Shingles.
If these things were not true, and stirring worked, I would be
promoting stirring and analyzing which method worked the best.
But none of these methods worked against the viruses we faced. I do
not know why, and you know I am capable of taking accurate enough
measurements of my process to tell if there was any change.
I believe the difference between running at 1.4 mA/sq. in and 87
uA/sq. in. is that fewer particles are generated and more ions are
available to kill viruses.
I would be happy to supply the derivations and detailed calculations
if you like.
And I hope this information is useful to document the effects of cs
on different viruses.
I feel the current density used to make the cs is crucial, and
nobody else runs at densities this low. But once it is made, very
little is needed to have a significant effect.
I believe this would help you in your goal.
Best Regards,
Mike Monett
--
The silver-list is a moderated forum for discussion of colloidal silver.
Instructions for unsubscribing may be found at: http://silverlist.org
To post, address your message to: [email protected]
Silver-list archive: http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/index.html
List maintainer: Mike Devour <[email protected]>
