Mike D: > I have not been reading every word of Mike's (long) posts, > so I'm not sure of everything that's been discussed...
Seems the crux of the matter is the morphing of "xx/ppm calculated" to "xx/ppm", of silver in solution. When dealing with the claim that "extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence", consider: Will presuppositions allow unbiased examination of the evidence? What would qualify as extraordinary evidence? What criteria is used to determine extraordinary evidence? Are criteria for extraordinary evidence reasonable? Hopefully, a healthy dialogue can be had by both parties. jr -- The silver-list is a moderated forum for discussion of colloidal silver. Instructions for unsubscribing may be found at: http://silverlist.org To post, address your message to: [email protected] Silver-list archive: http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/index.html List maintainer: Mike Devour <[email protected]>
