Will presuppositions allow unbiased examination of the evidence? What would qualify as extraordinary evidence? What criteria is used to determine extraordinary evidence? Are criteria for extraordinary evidence reasonable? -----------------------
All known methods of analytical study must be performed, and compared to existing data. I believe these analytical studies would show that Mike M. is wrong on several points, but maybe not the ones that matter: the ogliodynamic properties of the silver, the particle dispersion, and the efficacy against pathogens... Bob is right -- there are alot of anomalies that can occur with the production of CS. There are even some that defy "common" sense and even engineering theory -- and some that are even classified by DOD for national security reasons. There really is more to electricity than electrons. In the pursuit of knowledge, one applies every known test, every possible idea. Doing so may at times not be feasible or practical. However, in my book, WANTING to do less is unexcuseable, and is the result of 1. laziness, 2. fear, or 3. uncaring. I'm often amazed at how widespread wanting to say more and wanting to know less - is. Best Regards, Jason -- The silver-list is a moderated forum for discussion of colloidal silver. Instructions for unsubscribing may be found at: http://silverlist.org To post, address your message to: silver-list@eskimo.com Silver-list archive: http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/index.html List maintainer: Mike Devour <mdev...@eskimo.com>
