Hey!, do what works! [I'm glad it does] The point behind all this is that everything can be useful even if we don't know what's going on.
We do all appreciate our little volcanoes, don't we? It's part of the fun. It's how we tell each other and ourselves about our ideas of ourselves and learn, if we listen. But, ya just never know what you'll learn from who or where because, by definition, it's something you didn't know you didn't know. You can even be your own greatest teacher. In times of great disturbence, I used to write all my thoughts down and put them away for a year. It became pretty undeniably clear that I can distort anything and believe it...that most, if not all of that which was bothering me, came from me and was being projected outward for others to validate for me. [which, in my opinion, they always did] In other words, I can fool me better than any one else anywhere. There were a few 'sane' people who scurried away. Validation again. Ex Smokers seem to be the most avid anti smokers. If the villian they rejected as a villian in order to kick it out the door gains any tolerance at all...danger! All the cancers are your proof and those smokers that outlive you, ignored. That's how validation works. The active defense requires and active attack. If that works? OK. Everything takes what it takes. [sounds sorta stressful though] If I feel attacked, I know where to look. [right straight at me] It's not me that's being attacked. It's an active defense being used for a purpose that's in the process of working to keep the villian vilified and away from the door. [Maybe I'll cough for you] A wife is an angel of desire and a hope for the future. An ex wife is a witch and a past gone bad. It's the same person seen from a different viewpoint. She doesn't know she's a witch. She doesn't know what she taught you. Teachers 'never' know what they're teaching. I'll consider that no viewpoints are valid 'because' all viewpoints can be convincingly validated...especially mine, no matter how crazy, staring right at me from that piece of paper. OK, I'm totally insane. There's my very own proof that I can never know what I'm doing so long as it's believable. I can use that. But then, if I take the viewpoint that I always succeed, all I have to do is look around me to see what I was doing while you were co-operating with and validating my insanity. [That's a collective 'you' as in others, events, not "you" in particular.] Humm, now that was a brilliant failure! I can use that. Ode At 12:55 PM 7/25/2004 -0600, you wrote: > With regard to the back and forth about copper wire in the bottom of >a CS brewing jar, I wanted to let you know I am still using the coiled >silver electrode and the circle copper one, that you sent me many months >ago. It does make very good very clear EIS, much more consistently clear >than the U electrodes. Should I stop using them? The copper circle was >long, long ago completely coated, no copper shows whatsoever, and has >not from maybe even the second batch. > With regard to the problems I had for so long with yellow CS, I have >found that whether the contaminant is in the air or the water, as long >as I stick to using only distilled water that measures .3 uS or below on >my PWT the CS comes out clear close to 100% of the time. At .4 uS it is >a crap shoot whether the CS is clear or has color. At .5uS and above it >is nearly always yellow. Depending on what the city is sending us as tap >water, sometimes I have to double distill the water to get it down to .3 >uS. For drinking water I distill hot tap water and get DW averaging >about .6 or so. For CS making I distill filtered cold tap water, and it >comes out usually at .3, rarely .2. > This has all been so interesting. Just recently I had no .3 DW >ready, so I made a batch of CS with .4 DW, and it came out yellow. After >sitting in the brewing jar for a few days it went clear. This is the >first time I've ever had that happen, if the finished product is yellow >whatsoever, it has always gone more yellow with time. Weird. >paula (sol, who hopes you take no personal offense at my comments re >smoking--sometimes I need to vent somewhere, and doing it on the OT list >is less harmful to me than shooting the neighbors) > > > > > > > >-- >The Silver List is a moderated forum for discussing Colloidal Silver. > >Instructions for unsubscribing are posted at: http://silverlist.org > >To post, address your message to: [email protected] >Silver List archive: http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/index.html > >Address Off-Topic messages to: [email protected] >OT Archive: http://escribe.com/health/silverofftopiclist/index.html > >List maintainer: Mike Devour <[email protected]> > >
