I have found several sites that claim that silver hydroxide is insoluble. 
However
I also have found the following, the second one give in fact, the solubility of
silver hydroxide to 3 significant digits as 13.3 ppm.

This link http://chemmovies.unl.edu/chemistry/smallscale/SS063c.html I believe
intends to say that silver chloride is less soluble than silver hydroxide.  That
would mean it has a solubility greater than .89 ppm. See #4.  However they did
mess it up and say that silver hydroxide is less soluble than silver hydroxide 
by
mistake.

According to http://www.silver-colloids.com/Papers/Solubility_Products.PDF the
solubility of silver hydroxide is 13.3 ppm, which is what we often quote as the
stable limit for ionic silver on this list.  I feel this support the notion that
the silver in EIS is predominately silver hydroxide.

http://www.northland.cc.mn.us/Chemistry/solubility_products.htm lists silver
hydroxide as having a solubility (Ksp) of 2.0X10-8, compared with 1.6X10-10 for
silver chloride.  That would make silver hydroxide soluble than silver chloride,
but the exact difference would depend on the stoichiometry of the precipitant.

http://home.snu.edu/dept/chemistry/syllabi/ARCHIVES/CHEM1224/LABEXP~1/SILVER~1.PDF
shows the solubility Ksp of silver hydroxide to be 2.0 X 10-8 and silver 
chloride
to be 1.8 X 10-10 which is close to what the above reference shows it.

 I feel these support the notion that the silver in EIS is predominately silver
hydroxide which has a low solubility, but one that is sufficient for typically
EIS.

Marshall

Ode Coyote wrote:

> ##  Well sure.  The questions pertain more towards what happens if the
> silver ion 'doesn't' find a hydroxl ion and why, maybe, it's only a strong
> tendency rather than a mandate.
>  If making stable compounds were an 'absolute mandate', the CS water
> probably wouldn't have such a long unstable state.
>
>  If a silver ion can 'associate and orientate' itself with the hydroxl
> portion of a 'non' dissociated water molecule without actually making a
> compound...that might could prevent a hydroxl ion from finding it to some
> degree by hiding it's electron hole to some degree.
>
>   OH is a gas?  Could it just bubble off to some extent, leaving 'some'
> silver ions with nowhere to go, leaving them with choice #2. [Loose
> association with an occupied OH vs tightly bonded compound with a
> previously unoccupied OH]?
>  If AgO can be formed, apparently there are some O1 atoms running about
> looking for something to do and they might not all do any one given
> thing...same for the hydrogen?
> Could a Hydroxl ion 'Not' find a silver ion and get together with another
> hydrogen atom to turn back into water as 'its' choice #2?
>
>  It's my vauge and maybe erronious understanding that a silver particle can
> accumulate a minus charge from the Zeta.  It's probably not quite the same
> as an ionic charge, but could that minus zeta be similar enough have a
> stabilizing effect and attraction for a plus charged silver ion?
>  If some ions are orienting towards an occupied OH in a water molecule and
> are also attracting zeta charged metal, I see a sort of potential for a
> 'charge protected' crystal lattice structure forming around a water
> molecule as its nucleus...and another oriented varient using a silver oxide
> molecule.
>
>  Silver hydroxide is virtually insoluable in water [listed as
> "insoluable"]...one of the few hydroxides that aren't extremely soluable in
> water. If it's that insoluable, it doesn't seem likely to concentrate in
> solution.
> It's also stable enough that you can buy it in powder form.
>  That doesn't suggest spontanious conversions to silver oxide to me.
>
>  Another thing that doesn't get mentioned much:
> Many of the various deposits found in various places, regardless of color,
> will leave a shiny silver smear when wiped onto a surface and there's that
> silver slick that sometimes forms on top.  There's definitely some metallic
> silver running about.
> Ode
>
> At 03:17 PM 1/20/2005 -0500, you wrote:
> >
> >Ode Coyote wrote:
> >
> >> Dissolved Compounds still remain those compounds and don't change into
> >> something else when the water is removed.
> >>  A free silver ion isn't likely to be very stable and very much wants to
> >> share an electron with something.
> >
> >Solutions by their very nature are always neutral.  If you have an Ag+ ion,
> >there has to be a (-) ion to balance it. The two together will define the
> >compound.  For freshly made EIS the negative ion is the hydroxyl ion, IE OH-,
> >so the silver compound in EIS is actually silver hydroxide.  At higher
> >concentrations, silver hydroxide tends to become unstable, and will
> >spontaneouly convert to silver oxide.  This could be part of the aging
> process
> >that occurs when EIS sits, not sure.
>
> >
> >>
> >>
> >>  Question:
> >>  Does it HAVE to "share", or can it's desires be passified as an 'onlooker'
> >> or 'groupie', so to speak?
> >> Can a free silver ion 'associate' [identify?] itself... around and with...
> >> a water molecules opposite valence oxygen componant and become at least
> >> 'more' stable  without actually becoming a 'compound' made from out of that
> >> water molecule? ...a protective attraction vs an absolute reaction..
> >
> >A silver ion will tend to attact the OH portion of a water molecule,
> producing
> >silver hydroxide.  The remaining H will find a matching one, and form H2
> which
> >may remain dissolved or be outgassed over time.
> >
> >>
> >>
> >> Can a cluster of silver atoms that include one or more ions on it's surface
> >> to present an ionic 'appearance' to the water molecules also be included in
> >> such an attraction?
> >
> >A cluster of silver atoms do often obtain a charge.  They are not ions per
> say
> >I don't believe but just a cluster with a charge.  The charge is referred
> to as
> >the zeta when it is measured. The higher the charge or zeta, the more stable
> >the colloidal portion is. If they have no charge, then they will precipitate.
> >
> >Marshall
> >
> >>
> >>
> >> Warning:  Any in depth explanation one way or the other will probably
> >> confuse me.
> >>  Simple answers?  Yes, no , maybe sometimes?
> >>
> >> Ode
> >>
> >> --
> >> No virus found in this outgoing message.
> >> Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
> >> Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 265.7.1 - Release Date: 1/19/2005
> >>
> >> --
> >> The Silver List is a moderated forum for discussing Colloidal Silver.
> >>
> >> Instructions for unsubscribing are posted at: http://silverlist.org
> >>
> >> To post, address your message to: [email protected]
> >> Silver List archive: http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/index.html
> >>
> >> Address Off-Topic messages to: [email protected]
> >> OT Archive: http://escribe.com/health/silverofftopiclist/index.html
> >>
> >> List maintainer: Mike Devour <[email protected]>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >--
> >No virus found in this incoming message.
> >Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
> >Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 265.7.1 - Release Date: 1/19/2005
> >
> >
>
> --
> No virus found in this outgoing message.
> Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
> Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 265.7.1 - Release Date: 1/19/2005
>
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
> Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 265.7.2 - Release Date: 1/21/2005
>
> --
> No virus found in this outgoing message.
> Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
> Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 265.7.2 - Release Date: 1/21/2005