http://www.mercola.com/2005/mar/12/doctor_shortage.htm DOCTORS ON STRIKE? DEATHS DECREASE! CAN IT GET ANY CLEARER?
> From: "Jim Holmes" <ami...@starband.net> > Reply-To: silver-list@eskimo.com > Date: Sat, 12 Mar 2005 08:53:09 -0700 > To: <silver-list@eskimo.com> > Subject: RE: CS>[List Owner] Dan Nave > Resent-From: silver-list@eskimo.com > Resent-Date: Sat, 12 Mar 2005 07:54:05 -0800 > > Self defense? Syringe, Knife, Gun....if deadly, what is the difference? > The Syringe is more insidious, because it is presented as a healing. > > But, how many M.D.s know that they are the tool of a hidden population > reduction program? > > -----Original Message----- > From: Jonathan B. Britten [mailto:jbrit...@cc.nakamura-u.ac.jp] > Sent: Tuesday, March 08, 2005 7:25 PM > To: silver-list@eskimo.com > Subject: Re: CS>[List Owner] Dan Nave > > Generally I steer clear of this kind of controversy, but I have one > comment that I think may be helpful to anyone posting information about > health issues: be sure that any "attacks" do not invite or advocate > violence. > > I mention this because I did read the interesting attack on Pasteur > posted on the the Matrixcide web site. The author of this sometimes > highly intemperate essay at times clearly advocates physical violence > against MD's involved in vaccination programs. The author > unambiguously advocates shooting them. This is not a mere rhetorical > device or hyperbolic outburst; the author evidently is quite sincere > in advocating the deaths of those who would impose vaccination. He > makes this statement several times in the essay. > > I note that the author of the essay is NOT the person running the web > site. Nevertheless, it seems to me that a person who posts such > advocacy without taking the trouble to distance himself from such > comments runs the risk of being seen as a potential source of violence > himself. Further, I know that experts in bioterrorism are extremely > worried about public hysteria in the event of an epidemic/pandemic, and > worry about necessary measures for quarantining those whose refusal to > follow epidemiological guidelines might imperil others. This whole > issue is a can of ugly, writhing, toxic snakes, and even the best > people in the field can come to differing conclusions about the proper > course of action in an emergency. The point here is simple, though: > if I were among these folks, essays advocating the murder of doctors > would make me very worried indeed. I would want law enforcement > people to keep an eye on those advocating such actions. > > In summary, I think that the misdeeds of doctors, politicians, and > anyone doing wrong need to be exposed. However, those who advocate > violence are very likely to do great harm to their own cause, and to > bring unwanted attention to themselves and others associated with them. > > I think Mr. Devour should be aware of this aspect of the web site that > has brought about the controversy. > > > > > On Tuesday, Mar 8, 2005, at 12:49 Asia/Tokyo, M. G. Devour wrote: > >> Dan's charges that John Rigby's use of the list represents... >> >> "... an anti-establishment political philosophy..." >> >> "... an attack on Doctors, Politicians, and the System..." > > > -- > The Silver List is a moderated forum for discussing Colloidal Silver. > > Instructions for unsubscribing are posted at: http://silverlist.org > > To post, address your message to: silver-list@eskimo.com > Silver List archive: http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/index.html > > Address Off-Topic messages to: silver-off-topic-l...@eskimo.com > OT Archive: http://escribe.com/health/silverofftopiclist/index.html > > List maintainer: Mike Devour <mdev...@eskimo.com> >
