I believe in new world order that said I wonder where you get this notion
that Germany was forced into the war please explain.
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jim Holmes" <[email protected]>
To: <[email protected]>
Sent: Friday, March 11, 2005 1:29 PM
Subject: RE: CS>[List Owner] Dan Nave
The Nuremberg Trials were rigged. Just a couple of issues:
German officials were forced to sign confessions written in English, that
they could not read.
German members of the Board of Directors of I.G. Farben, a socialized
Corporation held to be guild of war crimes were tried and convicted.
American members of the same Board who served at the same time during WWII
were never charged.
Francis Parker Yockey, an American Lawyer, refused to participate in that
travesty of justice, and was eventually imprisoned and died in prison
under
mysterious circumstances.
Further, the Germans tried desperately to avoid the war; it was thrust
upon
them by England, as part of the N.W.O. plan that is now coming to
fruition.
Nothing is as it appears.
Him is right.
-----Original Message-----
From: Stuff [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Wednesday, March 09, 2005 5:38 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: CS>[List Owner] Dan Nave
It's not the leaders who are at fault. It's the followers.
Remember the Nuremberg Trials?
They were only following the law.
Forcing someone to do something is Wrong, law or not.
Why not learn to make our own judgments...and it's not
even necessary to 'fight the law' to do it.
stuff
At 07:34 PM 3/8/2005 -0700, you wrote:
I should point out that NO Dr. will administer a vaccine at gun
point....so..it is NOT his fault. If a law passes that requires everyone
to
have a vaccine by law (as some suggest will be on our NEW National ID
card)
then the person will be forced to get the vaccine. Again the Dr. is only
following the law. If we wish to stop this insanity...then we need to
address these issues with those we elect.... Due Process I'm told it is.
-----Original Message-----
From: Jonathan B. Britten [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 08, 2005 7:25 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: CS>[List Owner] Dan Nave
Generally I steer clear of this kind of controversy, but I have one
comment that I think may be helpful to anyone posting information about
health issues: be sure that any "attacks" do not invite or advocate
violence.
I mention this because I did read the interesting attack on Pasteur
posted on the the Matrixcide web site. The author of this sometimes
highly intemperate essay at times clearly advocates physical violence
against MD's involved in vaccination programs. The author
unambiguously advocates shooting them. This is not a mere rhetorical
device or hyperbolic outburst; the author evidently is quite sincere
in advocating the deaths of those who would impose vaccination. He
makes this statement several times in the essay.
I note that the author of the essay is NOT the person running the web
site. Nevertheless, it seems to me that a person who posts such
advocacy without taking the trouble to distance himself from such
comments runs the risk of being seen as a potential source of violence
himself. Further, I know that experts in bioterrorism are extremely
worried about public hysteria in the event of an epidemic/pandemic, and
worry about necessary measures for quarantining those whose refusal to
follow epidemiological guidelines might imperil others. This whole
issue is a can of ugly, writhing, toxic snakes, and even the best
people in the field can come to differing conclusions about the proper
course of action in an emergency. The point here is simple, though:
if I were among these folks, essays advocating the murder of doctors
would make me very worried indeed. I would want law enforcement
people to keep an eye on those advocating such actions.
In summary, I think that the misdeeds of doctors, politicians, and
anyone doing wrong need to be exposed. However, those who advocate
violence are very likely to do great harm to their own cause, and to
bring unwanted attention to themselves and others associated with them.
I think Mr. Devour should be aware of this aspect of the web site that
has brought about the controversy.
On Tuesday, Mar 8, 2005, at 12:49 Asia/Tokyo, M. G. Devour wrote:
> Dan's charges that John Rigby's use of the list represents...
>
> "... an anti-establishment political philosophy..."
>
> "... an attack on Doctors, Politicians, and the System..."
--
The Silver List is a moderated forum for discussing Colloidal Silver.
Instructions for unsubscribing are posted at: http://silverlist.org
To post, address your message to: [email protected]
Silver List archive: http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/index.html
Address Off-Topic messages to: [email protected]
OT Archive: http://escribe.com/health/silverofftopiclist/index.html
List maintainer: Mike Devour <[email protected]>
--
No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.308 / Virus Database: 266.6.4 - Release Date: 3/7/2005
--
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.308 / Virus Database: 266.6.4 - Release Date: 3/7/2005
