It's not the leaders who are at fault. It's the followers.
Remember the Nuremberg Trials? They were only following the law. Forcing someone to do something is Wrong, law or not. Why not learn to make our own judgments...and it's not even necessary to 'fight the law' to do it. stuff At 07:34 PM 3/8/2005 -0700, you wrote:
I should point out that NO Dr. will administer a vaccine at gun point....so..it is NOT his fault. If a law passes that requires everyone to have a vaccine by law (as some suggest will be on our NEW National ID card) then the person will be forced to get the vaccine. Again the Dr. is only following the law. If we wish to stop this insanity...then we need to address these issues with those we elect.... Due Process I'm told it is. -----Original Message----- From: Jonathan B. Britten [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Tuesday, March 08, 2005 7:25 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: CS>[List Owner] Dan Nave Generally I steer clear of this kind of controversy, but I have one comment that I think may be helpful to anyone posting information about health issues: be sure that any "attacks" do not invite or advocate violence. I mention this because I did read the interesting attack on Pasteur posted on the the Matrixcide web site. The author of this sometimes highly intemperate essay at times clearly advocates physical violence against MD's involved in vaccination programs. The author unambiguously advocates shooting them. This is not a mere rhetorical device or hyperbolic outburst; the author evidently is quite sincere in advocating the deaths of those who would impose vaccination. He makes this statement several times in the essay. I note that the author of the essay is NOT the person running the web site. Nevertheless, it seems to me that a person who posts such advocacy without taking the trouble to distance himself from such comments runs the risk of being seen as a potential source of violence himself. Further, I know that experts in bioterrorism are extremely worried about public hysteria in the event of an epidemic/pandemic, and worry about necessary measures for quarantining those whose refusal to follow epidemiological guidelines might imperil others. This whole issue is a can of ugly, writhing, toxic snakes, and even the best people in the field can come to differing conclusions about the proper course of action in an emergency. The point here is simple, though: if I were among these folks, essays advocating the murder of doctors would make me very worried indeed. I would want law enforcement people to keep an eye on those advocating such actions. In summary, I think that the misdeeds of doctors, politicians, and anyone doing wrong need to be exposed. However, those who advocate violence are very likely to do great harm to their own cause, and to bring unwanted attention to themselves and others associated with them. I think Mr. Devour should be aware of this aspect of the web site that has brought about the controversy. On Tuesday, Mar 8, 2005, at 12:49 Asia/Tokyo, M. G. Devour wrote: > Dan's charges that John Rigby's use of the list represents... > > "... an anti-establishment political philosophy..." > > "... an attack on Doctors, Politicians, and the System..." -- The Silver List is a moderated forum for discussing Colloidal Silver. Instructions for unsubscribing are posted at: http://silverlist.org To post, address your message to: [email protected] Silver List archive: http://escribe.com/health/thesilverlist/index.html Address Off-Topic messages to: [email protected] OT Archive: http://escribe.com/health/silverofftopiclist/index.html List maintainer: Mike Devour <[email protected]> -- No virus found in this incoming message. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.0.308 / Virus Database: 266.6.4 - Release Date: 3/7/2005
-- No virus found in this outgoing message. Checked by AVG Anti-Virus. Version: 7.0.308 / Virus Database: 266.6.4 - Release Date: 3/7/2005
