Is not a fever always necessary to kill a bacterial or viral infection...? each pathogen would require a different fever temperatures to do it in...if the fever is diminished for some reason..weak immune system or artificial means then perhaps pneumonia would set in...in my mothers memory of 1918 a doctor felt fever was not a good thing but many people here somehow knew not to open their windows and cool down ..she said it was a wide spread practice to cool down a patient...she was taught otherwise..12 kids in her family 7 in my dads ..also all the people they knew no one died in 1918 - 1919 flu..coffins lay in stacks at the railway station so it did take some..she was raised in poverty conditions and my father the same..in large part they ate what they caught or grew...perhaps their immune systems were part of the reason for their survival..I was allowed my fevers as kid...a couple were bad 104 to 105 (bacterial?)but now I kill with 101 Fahrenheit (viral?)with sweat baths garlic chicken soup and lemon plus now EIS olive leaf extract and oregano oil added :O) ...and I always clear my lower bowel to prevent constipation... Norm
__________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com -- The Silver List is a moderated forum for discussing Colloidal Silver. Instructions for unsubscribing are posted at: http://silverlist.org To post, address your message to: [email protected] Address Off-Topic messages to: [email protected] The Silver List and Off Topic List archives are currently down... List maintainer: Mike Devour <[email protected]>
