On Tue Sep 29 14:02 , Onno Kortmann sent: >Hi, >> > My concern isn't so much what VCS we use as what >> > happens with the code in Onno's repository. >As long as there is no consensus, I'll keep it on github.com. I clearly marked >it as 'unofficial'.
My expectation is that at least some of the work will end up in the official repository. Have you made changes to the regression test organization? I might need to. The effects of IN and OUT are cpu-dependent. It would be nice to have a clear starting point. >For the big patches: > >Except from discussions with Thomas, no there wasn't any formal review. Some >minor comments by some people why they dislike this or that. I hope I >integrated most of these smaller issues into the last version of >the 'patches' (= the git HEAD revision). > >What is the official review process for patches here? I asked about my changes >on the ML but as essentially nothing happened and everything seemed to be >dead here, Thomas and I proceeded. Send patches to ML. Wait for consensus. Clean up blood. Commit. I don't know about other patches, but one of my patches incorporated your three-in-one patch. >The patches in the tracker are seriously out of date. Managing them in the >tracker is a PITA. This is another reason why I'm using git now. -- Michael Hennebry [email protected] "War is only a hobby." ---- Msg sent via CableONE.net MyMail - http://www.cableone.net _______________________________________________ Simulavr-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/simulavr-devel
