On Wed Sep 30 0:53 , "Weddington, Eric" sent: > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: [email protected] [[email protected]','','','')">[email protected]] >> Sent: Wednesday, September 30, 2009 12:57 AM >> To: [email protected]; Onno Kortmann >> Cc: [email protected]; Weddington, Eric; >> [email protected]; 'Joerg Wunsch' >> Subject: Re: [Simulavr-devel] Discussion: how to proceed >> withthedeveloment on GIT repo? >> >> On Tue Sep 29 14:02 , Onno Kortmann sent: >> >> >What is the official review process for patches here? I >> asked about my changes >> >on the ML but as essentially nothing happened and everything >> seemed to be >> >dead here, Thomas and I proceeded.
>This is why I'm more than happy to add people to the project as developers or admins, as long as these overarching goals are kept in mind. I don't think that consensus would be that hard to reach in getting features added. If the ML seems deader longer than one would expect, would a "ping" be considered rude? There are occasional long silences. Sometimes it might be good to actually know that one is not alone. -- Michael Hennebry [email protected] "War is only a hobby." ---- Msg sent via CableONE.net MyMail - http://www.cableone.net _______________________________________________ Simulavr-devel mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/simulavr-devel
