Tom,

I'm sure any computer scientist worth their salt could

use a computer to write up random ten-billion-byte-long

algorithms that would do exactly nothing. Defining intelligence

that way because it's mathematically neat is just cheating


Let's assume that you can make a very long program that
is random and does not do anything.

Why is this a problem?

Cheers
Shane

-----
This list is sponsored by AGIRI: http://www.agiri.org/email
To unsubscribe or change your options, please go to:
http://v2.listbox.com/member/?member_id=4007604&user_secret=8eb45b07

Reply via email to