Hello,
thanks a lot Kingsley, for re-opening the discussion here.
Am 16.07.2010 09:41, schrieb Alexandre Passant:
On 16 Jul 2010, at 00:42, Nathan wrote:
kidehen wrote:
John,
The relation:
sioc:Space rdfs:subClassOf is:InfoService
or even
sioc:Space owl:equivalentClass is:InfoService
Work fine.
In either case its about a relationship between two Classes that offer
a mechanism for referencing partitioned data spaces on HTTP
networks :-)
sorry! not really, if I recall correctly an is:InfoService can be anything, on
the web or not, a library for instance, a service you can't dereference and use
as a dataspace unless you're a human in the real world.
Agreed, equivalentClass is imo wrong but the subclass would be ok, cf Bob's
definition and my previous comment at [1]
+1 sioc:Space rdfs:subClassOf is:InfoService
I my mind, an Information Service has a maybe bigger scope. However, if
one would like to use it with some non-computer related things, one also
have to create an URI or literal for that thing at least for
identification, or?
Please refer also my blog post[1] about the Information Service definition.
Please let me also know, if you are happy with that definition.
Cheers,
Bob
[1]
http://infoserviceonto.wordpress.com/2010/06/23/what-is-an-information-service/
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"SIOC-Dev" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected].
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected].
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sioc-dev?hl=en.
