On Tue, 27 Mar 2001, Jonathan Rosenberg wrote:
> Similarly, the names for G.726 codecs above are incorrect in the above
> device output. For the 24 bit one, its "G726-24" as specified in the update
> to rfc1890. I'm not sure why "G726-24" doesn't appear in the MIME type
> registration draft, though. Perhaps some of the avt folks, cc'd, can
> comment.
Oops. G726-24 (and -40 and -16) were added to the update to RFC1890
at the last minute. It was an oversight that they were not added to
the rtp-mime draft. Thanks for pointing this out.
-- Steve
_______________________________________________
Sip-implementors mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/sip-implementors
