Hi,
Record-Route's make sense only in 1xx/2xx responses.
It doesn't make sense in non-2xx responses since you're
not establishing a dialog anyway. ACK's for 2xx responses
only need to contain the Route headers.Ref: Table 2-3 in RFC 3261. Regards, Subhash Nayak http://www.hssworld.com "Annamalai Meenatchy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 12/20/2002 11:51:55 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] cc: (bcc: Subhash Ullal Nayak/HSSBLR) Subject: [Sip-implementors] Record-Route Hi, I have a question about Record-Route. As for as I understood only 401 & 484 among non-200 response includes Record-Route. All other non-200 response doesn't include them. Does the ACK for 401, 484 and 2xx responses need to include the route headers? Can someone clarify this for me? Thanks, Meena
|
Hi,
I have a question about Record-Route. As for as I understood only 401 & 484 among non-200 response includes Record-Route. All other non-200 response doesn't include them. Does the ACK for 401, 484 and 2xx responses need to include the route headers? Can someone clarify this for me? Thanks, Meena |
