Re: [Sip-implementors] Record-Route

Mon, 23 Dec 2002 12:27:08 -0800

Thanks for reply..
 
I am referring to the draft draft-ietf-sip-rfc2543bis-03, as  I need to communicate with SIP proxy which follows this draft version. In this Table 5 says 2xx,401 & 484 can include Record-Route.
In such case, does ACK need to contain Route header?
 
Thanks,
Meena
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Monday, December 23, 2002 12:29 PM
Subject: Re: [Sip-implementors] Record-Route



Hi,
     Record-Route's make sense only in 1xx/2xx responses.
It doesn't make sense in non-2xx responses since you're
not establishing a dialog anyway. ACK's for 2xx responses
only need to contain the Route headers.

Ref: Table 2-3 in RFC 3261.

Regards,
Subhash Nayak
http://www.hssworld.com





"Annamalai Meenatchy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on 12/20/2002 11:51:55
AM

To:   [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:    (bcc: Subhash Ullal Nayak/HSSBLR)

Subject:  [Sip-implementors] Record-Route




Hi,

 I have a question about Record-Route. As for as I understood only 401 &
 484 among non-200 response includes Record-Route. All other non-200
 response doesn't include them. Does the ACK for 401, 484 and 2xx
 responses need to  include the route headers?

 Can someone clarify this for me?

Thanks,
Meena


Reply via email to