Hi, > Hey, I think the Port in the To-header is legal. This is explicitly > said in the RFC, but in the grammar definition chapter it is defined the > same way as Request-URI.
According to the table on page 152 the Port is not allowed in the To header. I can understand that we don't want to put possible maddr-, ttl- etc parameters in the To header, even if used in the Request-URI, but I think that the port is more part of the "core" URI than it is a uri parameter... Regards, Christer Holmberg Ericsson Finland > > > Christer Holmberg wrote: > > >Hi, > > > >I wonder WHY the Port in the To-header illegal? I think most people (the spec also > >says it) in the initial INVITE use the same value in the Request-URI and To header > >URI, so why should I have to remove the port from the To header if present in the > >Request-URI? > > > > > -- > Pozdrofka, > Mariusz Maslowski > > _______________________________________________ > Sip-implementors mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/sip-implementors _______________________________________________ Sip-implementors mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/sip-implementors
