Hi,

I wonder WHY the Port in the To-header illegal? I think most people (the spec also 
says it) in the initial INVITE use the same value in the Request-URI and To header 
URI, so why should I have to remove the port from the To header if present in the 
Request-URI?

Regards,

Christer Holmberg
Ericsson Finland


[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

> Port in the To-header is illegal. Also, you cannot change the To-header. It must be 
> identical to the remote-uri that was sent in the from-header of the INVITE.
>
> The Request-URI in the BYE MUST be set to the URI that was sent in the 
> contact-header of the INVITE (including ports). So, you actually have 2 bugs, the 
> second being that you are using to-header to populate the request-uri of the BYE. 
> You should use the remote-target instead (contact uri in the INVITE).
>
> Regards,
> Hisham
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: ext Mariusz Maslowski [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2003 4:45 PM
> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Subject: Re: [Sip-implementors] Problem with BYE
> >
> >
> > Hello everybody,
> >
> > If anyone still is wondering why the Helmsman UA is not responding to
> > the BYE, I have news for you.
> >
> > The problem was with the port which was different from default in the
> > To: header, most probably.
> >
> > When I set up the Helmsmann UA to the 5060 port the dialog
> > termination
> > was successful.
> >
> > Now my UA sends a BYE request is as follows, and it is
> > replied with 200 OK.
> >
> > BYE sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:5060 SIP/2.0
> > CALL-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > FROM: "SIP AGENT" <sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;tag=1263000170
> > TO: <sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:5060>;tag=-821407910
> > CSEQ: 1 BYE
> > VIA: SIP/2.0/UDP 192.168.0.34:5060;branch=z9hG4bK2079048389
> > MAX-FORWARDS: 70
> > CONTENT-LENGTH: 0
> >
> >
> > --
> > Pozdrofka,
> > Mariusz Maslowski
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Sip-implementors mailing list
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > http://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/sip-implementors
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> Sip-implementors mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/sip-implementors

_______________________________________________
Sip-implementors mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/sip-implementors

Reply via email to