RE: [Sip-implementors] Can a B2BUA insert Record-Route header?

[Henry Chen]

Title: Message

I think it is perfect fine for a B2BUA to add Record-Route header into initial INVITE, example of this is a B2BUA 3pc controller.   Thanks,   Henry     -----Original Message----- From: Patrick Lam [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 8:09 AM To: 'Nataraju A.B.'; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [Sip-implementors] Can a B2BUA insert Record-Route header? Yeah.  I know.   I got into a scenario (kind of complicated to explain though) that I need the UAC to insert a Record-Route into INVITE.   I am just wondering if this violates RFC 3261 at all.   Thanks again.   Patrick   -----Original Message----- From: Nataraju A.B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 9:00 PM To: Patrick Lam; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Sip-implementors] Can a B2BUA insert Record-Route header?   If it is behaving as a UAC, there is no point in adding RR (since the call always ends there).   Its of more senseful only in case of SIP entities acting as routers between UAC & UAS......   Regards, ------------------------------------------- Nataraju A.B. Huawei Technologies India Pvt. Ltd., Tel : +91-80-5217152 / 4 Xtn 142 ------------------------------------------- ----- Original Message ----- From: Patrick Lam To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 6:08 PM Subject: [Sip-implementors] Can a B2BUA insert Record-Route header?   Dear all:   Can a B2BUA (when acting as a UAC) insert a Record-Route header when it initiates an INVITE?  I know it’s not normal, but I also don’t see RFC3261 forbidding it.  Would it cause problems at all?   Thanks very much in advance,   Patrick _______________________________________________ Sip-implementors mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/sip-implementors

_______________________________________________
Sip-implementors mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.cs.columbia.edu/mailman/listinfo/sip-implementors